Player Stats

Chris Todd College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
3,336
Passing yards
3,515
Touchdowns
27

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2008 Regular SeasonAuburn7840903-63540.4
2009 PostseasonAuburn13220235-15164.3
2009 Regular SeasonAuburn132,2762,377-1012164.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason

Auburn paired 2,496 primary output with 58.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 58.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Furman

Win with 264 yards of offense and 83.6 efficiency. It landed in the 84.6th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Postseason · Auburn

Games

13

Primary Metric / G

192

Efficiency

58.8

Usage

8.6

Consistency

79.3

Best Game by takeover score

Furman

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 220. Louisiana Tech: 258. Mississippi State: 192. West Virginia: 270. Ball State: 289. Tennessee: 205. Arkansas: 101. Kentucky: 95. LSU: 23. Ole Miss: 185. Furman: 264. Georgia: 216. Alabama: 178

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 35 by 56.9. Louisiana Tech: 27 by 69.3. Mississippi State: 24 by 67.7. West Virginia: 36 by 53.8. Ball State: 27 by 71.3. Tennessee: 35 by 54. Arkansas: 32 by 48.3. Kentucky: 26 by 56.9. LSU: 21 by 39.1. Ole Miss: 27 by 58.7. Furman: 20 by 83.6. Georgia: 32 by 53.4. Alabama: 30 by 51.1

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins235.4 · Games = 8 · +112.8 vs Losses
Losses122.6 · Games = 5 · -112.8 vs Wins