Usage Score
8.6
Player Dossier
2008-2009Auburn
QB • 6'4" • Elizabethtown, KY, USA
Chris Todd is a balanced quarterback profile with 8.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
8.6
Efficiency
58.8
Consistency
79.3
Season Value
61.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Auburn
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Todd, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Auburn. Chris Todd is a balanced quarterback profile with 8.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Chris Todd played QB for Auburn. Across 2 tracked seasons, Chris Todd recorded 3,515 passing yards, -179 rushing yards, and 27 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Auburn.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Auburn paired 2,496 primary output with 58.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 58.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Furman
Win with 264 yards of offense and 83.6 efficiency. It landed in the 84.6th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
192
Efficiency
58.8
Usage
8.6
Consistency
79.3
Best Game by takeover score
Furman
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 220. Louisiana Tech: 258. Mississippi State: 192. West Virginia: 270. Ball State: 289. Tennessee: 205. Arkansas: 101. Kentucky: 95. LSU: 23. Ole Miss: 185. Furman: 264. Georgia: 216. Alabama: 178
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 35 by 56.9. Louisiana Tech: 27 by 69.3. Mississippi State: 24 by 67.7. West Virginia: 36 by 53.8. Ball State: 27 by 71.3. Tennessee: 35 by 54. Arkansas: 32 by 48.3. Kentucky: 26 by 56.9. LSU: 21 by 39.1. Ole Miss: 27 by 58.7. Furman: 20 by 83.6. Georgia: 32 by 53.4. Alabama: 30 by 51.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Furman
Best efficiency game
83.6 vs Furman
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | vs Northwestern | W 38-35 | 20 | 31 | 235 | 64.5 | 1 | 0 | 56.9 | 4 | -15 | -3.80 | 0 | 4 |
| Fri 11/27 | vs Alabama | L 21-26 | 15 | 25 | 181 | 60.0 | 2 | 1 | 51.1 | 5 | -3 | -0.60 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 11/15 | @ Georgia | L 24-31 | 20 | 28 | 238 | 71.4 | 2 | 2 | 53.4 | 4 | -22 | -5.50 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Furman3+ TD | W 63-31 | 17 | 18 | 256 | 94.4 | 4 | 0 | 83.6 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Ole Miss | W 33-20 | 12 | 22 | 212 | 54.5 | 1 | 0 | 58.7 | 5 | -27 | -5.40 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ LSU | L 10-31 | 8 | 14 | 47 | 57.1 | 0 | 1 | 39.1 | 7 | -24 | -3.40 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Kentucky | L 14-21 | 10 | 24 | 80 | 41.7 | 0 | 1 | 56.9 | 2 | 15 | 7.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Arkansas | L 23-44 | 15 | 28 | 133 | 53.6 | 0 | 0 | 48.3 | 4 | -32 | -8 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Tennessee | W 26-22 | 19 | 32 | 218 | 59.4 | 1 | 0 | 54 | 3 | -13 | -4.30 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Ball State3+ TD | W 54-30 | 19 | 26 | 287 | 73.1 | 5 | 0 | 71.3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs West Virginia3+ TD | W 41-30 | 16 | 31 | 284 | 51.6 | 4 | 1 | 53.8 | 5 | -14 | -2.80 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Mississippi State | W 49-24 | 10 | 23 | 186 | 43.5 | 0 | 0 | 67.7 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 37-13 | 17 | 26 | 255 | 65.4 | 2 | 0 | 69.3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Auburn
2008-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Auburn | 840 | 45.2 | 12.3 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Auburn | 2,496 | 58.8 | 8.6 | 1,656 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Auburn | 2,496 | 58.8 | 8.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Furman
Win with 264 yards of offense and 83.6 efficiency.
264
Primary metric
264 total offense with 83.6 efficiency.
#2
LSU
249
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
249 total offense with 48.3 efficiency.
#3
Ball State
289
Primary metric
Win with 289 yards of offense and 71.3 efficiency.
289 total offense with 71.3 efficiency.
#4
Louisiana Tech
258
Primary metric
Win with 258 yards of offense and 69.3 efficiency.
258 total offense with 69.3 efficiency.
#5
West Virginia
270
Primary metric
Win with 270 yards of offense and 53.8 efficiency.
270 total offense with 53.8 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Postseason · Auburn
2,496 primary output · 58.8 efficiency · 8.6 usage
61.7
#2
2009 Regular Season · Auburn
61.7
2,496 primary · 58.8 efficiency · 8.6 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Auburn
36.7
840 primary · 45.2 efficiency · 12.3 usage
5
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
3
3+ TD games
4
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
3,336
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.