Usage Score
38.9
Player Dossier
2008-2011Cincinnati
RB • 5'11" • Columbus, OH, USA
Isaiah Pead leans workhorse runner traits and 55.5 efficiency.
Usage Score
38.9
Efficiency
55.5
Consistency
70.7
Season Value
66.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · Cincinnati
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Isaiah Pead, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · Cincinnati. Isaiah Pead leans workhorse runner traits and 55.5 efficiency.
Isaiah Pead played RB for Cincinnati. Across 4 tracked seasons, Isaiah Pead recorded 3,288 rushing yards, 721 receiving yards, and 33 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Cincinnati.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Cincinnati paired 1,578 primary output with 55.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 55.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Loss with 170 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 76.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
121.4
Efficiency
55.5
Usage
38.9
Consistency
70.7
Best Game by takeover score
Tennessee
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Vanderbilt: 164. Austin Peay: 97. Tennessee: 170. Akron: 15. NC State: 191. Miami (OH): 54. Louisville: 155. South Florida: 127. Pittsburgh: 138. West Virginia: 180. Rutgers: 28. Syracuse: 192. UConn: 67
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Vanderbilt: 31 by 55.3. Austin Peay: 8 by 100. Tennessee: 16 by 94.3. Akron: 6 by 26. NC State: 30 by 65.2. Miami (OH): 20 by 28.3. Louisville: 23 by 75.3. South Florida: 26 by 42.8. Pittsburgh: 26 by 55.6. West Virginia: 24 by 68.4. Rutgers: 14 by 20.8. Syracuse: 26 by 60.2. UConn: 26 by 29.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tennessee
Best efficiency game
100 vs Austin Peay
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | @ Vanderbilt100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 31-24 | 28 | 149 | 5.30 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 5.3 |
| Sat 12/3 | vs UConn | W 35-27 | 23 | 68 | 3 | 0 | 3 | -1 | 2.6 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Syracuse150 scrimmage yards · 2+ TD | W 30-13 | 17 | 80 | 4.70 | 1 | 9 | 112 | 7.4 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Rutgers | L 3-20 | 14 | 28 | 2 | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs West Virginia100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 21-24 | 19 | 113 | 5.90 | 2 | 5 | 67 | 7.5 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Pittsburgh100 rush yards | W 26-23 | 22 | 118 | 5.40 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 5.3 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ South Florida | W 37-34 | 22 | 79 | 3.60 | 0 | 4 | 48 | 4.9 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Louisville100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 25-16 | 20 | 151 | 7.60 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 6.7 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Miami (OH)2+ TD | W 27-0 | 18 | 49 | 2.70 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2.7 |
| Fri 9/23 | vs NC State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 44-14 | 27 | 167 | 6.20 | 1 | 3 | 24 | 6.4 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Akron | W 59-14 | 6 | 15 | 2.50 | 1 | — | — | 2.5 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Tennessee100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 23-45 | 14 | 155 | 11.10 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 10.6 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Austin Peay2+ TD | W 72-10 | 7 | 87 | 12.40 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 12.1 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Cincinnati
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Cincinnati | 205 | 57.5 | 10.2 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 205 | 57.5 | 10.2 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Cincinnati | 1,007 | 65.7 | 21.5 | 802 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 1,007 | 65.7 | 21.5 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 1,219 | 59.9 | 33.7 | 212 |
| 2011 Postseason | Cincinnati | 1,578 | 55.5 | 38.9 | 359 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 1,578 | 55.5 | 38.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
West Virginia
Win with 188 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
188
Primary metric
188 scrimmage yards and 41.7 usage.
#2
Rutgers
249
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
249 scrimmage yards and 47.8 usage.
#3
Tennessee
170
Primary metric
Loss with 170 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
170 scrimmage yards and 34 usage.
#4
Syracuse
192
Primary metric
Win with 192 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
192 scrimmage yards and 50 usage.
#5
West Virginia
180
Primary metric
Loss with 180 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
180 scrimmage yards and 48 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Postseason · Cincinnati
1,578 primary output · 55.5 efficiency · 38.9 usage
66.3
#2
2011 Regular Season · Cincinnati
66.3
1,578 primary · 55.5 efficiency · 38.9 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Cincinnati
57.7
1,219 primary · 59.9 efficiency · 33.7 usage
11
100+ rush yards
10
150+ scrimmage yards
9
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
4,009
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.