Usage Score
21.6
Player Profile
Travis Kelce
TE • 6'6" • Cleveland Heights, OH, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Travis Kelce reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
82.5
Consistency
65.3
Season Value
67.3
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Cincinnati
09091011111212
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- Cincinnati
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Cincinnati
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Travis Kelce, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Cincinnati. Travis Kelce reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Cincinnati paired 722 primary output with 82.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Cincinnati
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
55.5
Efficiency
82.5
Usage
21.6
Consistency
65.3
Best Game by takeover score
Duke
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Duke: 123. Pittsburgh: 42. Unknown: 5. Virginia Tech: 47. Miami (OH): 27. Unknown: 101. Toledo: 64. Louisville: 22. Syracuse: 77. Temple: 37. Rutgers: 50. South Florida: 58. UConn: 69
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 5 by 100. Pittsburgh: 2 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 33.3. Virginia Tech: 2 by 100. Miami (OH): 2 by 90. Unknown: 3 by 100. Toledo: 3 by 100. Louisville: 2 by 73.3. Syracuse: 4 by 100. Temple: 4 by 61.7. Rutgers: 5 by 66.7. South Florida: 7 by 55.2. UConn: 5 by 92
Split Comparison
Wins60 · n=8 · +14.7 vs Losses
Losses45.3 · n=3 · -14.7 vs Wins
First Half58.4 · n=7 · +6.3 vs Second Half
Second Half52.2 · n=6 · -6.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Duke
Best efficiency game
100 vs Duke
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/27 | @ Duke100 receiving yards | W 48-34 | — | 5 | 123 | 24.6 | 24.60 | 1 | 83 |
| Sat 12/1 | @ UConn2+ TD | W 34-17 | — | 5 | 69 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 2 | 25 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs South Florida | W 27-10 | — | 7 | 58 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Rutgers | L 3-10 | — | 5 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Temple | W 34-10 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Syracuse2+ TD | W 35-24 | — | 4 | 77 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 2 | 37 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Louisville | L 31-34 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Toledo | L 23-29 | — | 3 | 64 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 3 | 101 | 33.7 | 33.70 | 1 | 78 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Miami (OH) | W 52-14 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Virginia Tech | W 27-24 | — | 2 | 47 | 23.5 | 23.50 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Fri 9/7 | vs Pittsburgh | W 34-10 | — | 2 | 42 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 27 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009200920102011201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Cincinnati | 3 | 20 | 4.2 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 3 | 20 | 4.2 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | — | — | -3 |
| 2011 Postseason | Cincinnati | 150 | 61.8 | 9.5 | 150 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 150 | 61.8 | 9.5 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Cincinnati | 722 | 82.5 | 21.6 | 572 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 722 | 82.5 | 21.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Duke
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123
Primary metric
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Florida
41
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
101
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Syracuse
77
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Miami (OH)
30
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Cincinnati
722 primary output · 82.5 efficiency · 21.6 usage
67.3
#2
2012 Regular Season · Cincinnati
67.3
722 primary · 82.5 efficiency · 21.6 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Cincinnati
39.2
150 primary · 61.8 efficiency · 9.5 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.7667
Cleveland Heights · Cleveland, OH
- Committed To
- Cincinnati
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
875
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.