Player Dossier

2009-2012

Cincinnati

Travis Kelce

TE • 6'6" • Cleveland Heights, OH, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Travis Kelce reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

21.6

Efficiency

82.5

Consistency

65.3

Season Value

67.3

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Cincinnati

09091011111212

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
Cincinnati
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Duke

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Travis Kelce, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Cincinnati. Travis Kelce reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Travis Kelce played TE for Cincinnati. Across 4 tracked seasons, Travis Kelce recorded 39 passing yards, 47 rushing yards, and 875 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Cincinnati.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason

Cincinnati paired 722 primary output with 82.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 82.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Duke

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · Cincinnati

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

55.5

Efficiency

82.5

Usage

21.6

Consistency

65.3

Best Game by takeover score

Duke

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Duke: 123. Pittsburgh: 42. Unknown: 5. Virginia Tech: 47. Miami (OH): 27. Unknown: 101. Toledo: 64. Louisville: 22. Syracuse: 77. Temple: 37. Rutgers: 50. South Florida: 58. UConn: 69

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 5 by 100. Pittsburgh: 2 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 33.3. Virginia Tech: 2 by 100. Miami (OH): 2 by 90. Unknown: 3 by 100. Toledo: 3 by 100. Louisville: 2 by 73.3. Syracuse: 4 by 100. Temple: 4 by 61.7. Rutgers: 5 by 66.7. South Florida: 7 by 55.2. UConn: 5 by 92

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins60 · Games = 8 · +14.7 vs Losses
Losses45.3 · Games = 3 · -14.7 vs Wins
First Half58.4 · Games = 7 · +6.3 vs Second Half
Second Half52.2 · Games = 6 · -6.3 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Duke

Best efficiency game

100 vs Duke

Result
Thu 12/27@ Duke100 receiving yardsW 48-34512324.624.60183
Sat 12/1@ UConn2+ TDW 34-1756913.813.80225
Sat 11/24vs South FloridaW 27-107588.38.30117
Sat 11/17vs RutgersL 3-105501010016
Sat 11/10@ TempleW 34-104379.39.30015
Sat 11/3vs Syracuse2+ TDW 35-2447719.319.30237
Sat 10/27@ LouisvilleL 31-342221111019
Sat 10/20@ ToledoL 23-2936421.321.30046
Sat 10/13vs Unknown100 receiving yards310133.733.70178
Sat 10/6vs Miami (OH)W 52-1422713.513.50119
Sat 9/29vs Virginia TechW 27-2424723.523.50032
Sat 9/15vs Unknown155505
Fri 9/7vs PittsburghW 34-102422121027

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Cincinnati

    2009-2012

    Opening stop

Season Progression

2009200920102011201120122012
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2009 PostseasonCincinnati3204.2
2009 Regular SeasonCincinnati3204.20
2010 Regular SeasonCincinnati0-3
2011 PostseasonCincinnati15061.89.5150
2011 Regular SeasonCincinnati15061.89.50
2012 PostseasonCincinnati72282.521.6572
2012 Regular SeasonCincinnati72282.521.60

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Duke

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

123

Primary metric

123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

South Florida

41

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Unknown

101

Primary metric

Game with an explosive receiving profile.

101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Syracuse

77

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Miami (OH)

30

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2012 Postseason · Cincinnati

722 primary output · 82.5 efficiency · 21.6 usage

67.3

#2

2012 Regular Season · Cincinnati

67.3

722 primary · 82.5 efficiency · 21.6 usage

#3

2011 Postseason · Cincinnati

39.2

150 primary · 61.8 efficiency · 9.5 usage

Milestones

2

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

2

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

2★

Class 2008 · Rating 0.7667

Cleveland Heights · Cleveland, OH

Committed To
Cincinnati
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2008

Career Facts

1

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

875

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.