Usage Score
21.6
Player Dossier
2009-2012Cincinnati
TE • 6'6" • Cleveland Heights, OH, USA
Travis Kelce reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
21.6
Efficiency
82.5
Consistency
65.3
Season Value
67.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Cincinnati
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Travis Kelce, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Cincinnati. Travis Kelce reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Travis Kelce played TE for Cincinnati. Across 4 tracked seasons, Travis Kelce recorded 39 passing yards, 47 rushing yards, and 875 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Cincinnati.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Cincinnati paired 722 primary output with 82.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
55.5
Efficiency
82.5
Usage
21.6
Consistency
65.3
Best Game by takeover score
Duke
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Duke: 123. Pittsburgh: 42. Unknown: 5. Virginia Tech: 47. Miami (OH): 27. Unknown: 101. Toledo: 64. Louisville: 22. Syracuse: 77. Temple: 37. Rutgers: 50. South Florida: 58. UConn: 69
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 5 by 100. Pittsburgh: 2 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 33.3. Virginia Tech: 2 by 100. Miami (OH): 2 by 90. Unknown: 3 by 100. Toledo: 3 by 100. Louisville: 2 by 73.3. Syracuse: 4 by 100. Temple: 4 by 61.7. Rutgers: 5 by 66.7. South Florida: 7 by 55.2. UConn: 5 by 92
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Duke
Best efficiency game
100 vs Duke
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/27 | @ Duke100 receiving yards | W 48-34 | — | 5 | 123 | 24.6 | 24.60 | 1 | 83 |
| Sat 12/1 | @ UConn2+ TD | W 34-17 | — | 5 | 69 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 2 | 25 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs South Florida | W 27-10 | — | 7 | 58 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Rutgers | L 3-10 | — | 5 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Temple | W 34-10 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Syracuse2+ TD | W 35-24 | — | 4 | 77 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 2 | 37 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Louisville | L 31-34 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Toledo | L 23-29 | — | 3 | 64 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 3 | 101 | 33.7 | 33.70 | 1 | 78 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Miami (OH) | W 52-14 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Virginia Tech | W 27-24 | — | 2 | 47 | 23.5 | 23.50 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Fri 9/7 | vs Pittsburgh | W 34-10 | — | 2 | 42 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 27 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Cincinnati
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Cincinnati | 3 | 20 | 4.2 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 3 | 20 | 4.2 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 0 | — | — | -3 |
| 2011 Postseason | Cincinnati | 150 | 61.8 | 9.5 | 150 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 150 | 61.8 | 9.5 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Cincinnati | 722 | 82.5 | 21.6 | 572 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 722 | 82.5 | 21.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Duke
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123
Primary metric
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Florida
41
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
101
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Syracuse
77
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Miami (OH)
30
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Cincinnati
722 primary output · 82.5 efficiency · 21.6 usage
67.3
#2
2012 Regular Season · Cincinnati
67.3
722 primary · 82.5 efficiency · 21.6 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Cincinnati
39.2
150 primary · 61.8 efficiency · 9.5 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2008 · Rating 0.7667
Cleveland Heights · Cleveland, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
875
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.