Usage Score
38.2
Player Dossier
2008-2010Illinois
RB • 6'0" • Champaign, IL, USA
Mikel Leshoure leans workhorse runner traits and 61.4 efficiency.
Usage Score
38.2
Efficiency
61.4
Consistency
67.8
Season Value
66.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · Illinois
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mikel Leshoure, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · Illinois. Mikel Leshoure leans workhorse runner traits and 61.4 efficiency.
Mikel Leshoure played RB for Illinois. Across 3 tracked seasons, Mikel Leshoure recorded 2,557 rushing yards, 439 receiving yards, and 28 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Illinois.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Illinois paired 1,893 primary output with 61.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 61.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
145.6
Efficiency
61.4
Usage
38.2
Consistency
67.8
Best Game by takeover score
Northwestern
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 205. Missouri: 112. Southern Illinois: 109. Northern Illinois: 186. Ohio State: 82. Penn State: 151. Michigan State: 93. Indiana: 80. Purdue: 69. Michigan: 172. Minnesota: 151. Northwestern: 341. Fresno State: 142
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 31 by 67.2. Missouri: 20 by 58.3. Southern Illinois: 15 by 77.6. Northern Illinois: 25 by 77.9. Ohio State: 21 by 42.6. Penn State: 28 by 50. Michigan State: 26 by 37.5. Indiana: 17 by 49.7. Purdue: 17 by 26.5. Michigan: 26 by 58.8. Minnesota: 19 by 82.1. Northwestern: 34 by 91.8. Fresno State: 19 by 77.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northwestern
Best efficiency game
91.8 vs Northwestern
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/29 | @ Baylor100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 38-14 | 29 | 184 | 6.30 | 3 | 2 | 21 | 6.6 |
| Sat 12/4 | @ Fresno State100 rush yards | L 23-25 | 19 | 142 | 7.50 | 1 | — | — | 7.5 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Northwestern100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 48-27 | 33 | 330 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 10.0 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Minnesota100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 34-38 | 18 | 141 | 7.80 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 7.9 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Michigan100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 65-67 | 24 | 120 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 52 | 6.6 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Purdue2+ TD | W 44-10 | 15 | 23 | 1.50 | 2 | 2 | 46 | 4.1 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Indiana | W 43-13 | 16 | 77 | 4.80 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4.7 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Michigan State | L 6-26 | 23 | 83 | 3.60 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 3.6 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Penn State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 33-13 | 27 | 119 | 4.40 | 0 | 1 | 32 | 5.4 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Ohio State | L 13-24 | 19 | 80 | 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3.9 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Northern Illinois100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 28-22 | 24 | 180 | 7.50 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7.4 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Southern Illinois100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 35-3 | 14 | 106 | 7.60 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7.3 |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Missouri100 rush yards | L 13-23 | 20 | 112 | 5.60 | 0 | — | — | 5.6 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Illinois
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Illinois | 192 | 47.2 | 9 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Illinois | 911 | 65 | 21.1 | 719 |
| 2010 Postseason | Illinois | 1,893 | 61.4 | 38.2 | 982 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Illinois | 1,893 | 61.4 | 38.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Northwestern
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
341
Primary metric
341 scrimmage yards and 44.7 usage.
#2
Fresno State
206
Primary metric
Loss with 206 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
206 scrimmage yards and 20.7 usage.
#3
Penn State
49
Primary metric
Loss with 49 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
49 scrimmage yards and 9.1 usage.
#4
Michigan
164
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
164 scrimmage yards and 34.4 usage.
#5
Northern Illinois
186
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
186 scrimmage yards and 44.6 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Postseason · Illinois
1,893 primary output · 61.4 efficiency · 38.2 usage
66.8
#2
2010 Regular Season · Illinois
66.8
1,893 primary · 61.4 efficiency · 38.2 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Illinois
48.9
911 primary · 65 efficiency · 21.1 usage
12
100+ rush yards
8
150+ scrimmage yards
8
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2008 · Rating 0.8778
Unknown · Nashville, TN
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
2,996
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.