Usage Score
26.7
Player Dossier
2015-2019Missouri
QB • 6'3" • 225 lbs • Calhoun Falls, SC, USA
Kelly Bryant is a balanced quarterback profile with 26.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
26.7
Efficiency
60
Consistency
75.3
Season Value
58.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Clemson
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kelly Bryant, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Clemson. Kelly Bryant is a balanced quarterback profile with 26.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Kelly Bryant played QB for Clemson and Missouri. Across 5 tracked seasons, Kelly Bryant recorded 5,553 passing yards, 1,215 rushing yards, and 6 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Clemson.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Clemson paired 3,467 primary output with 63.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Clemson, Missouri.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Loss with 443 yards of offense and 62 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
245.7
Efficiency
60
Usage
26.7
Consistency
75.3
Best Game by takeover score
Wyoming
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 443. West Virginia: 150. Southeast Missouri State: 231. South Carolina: 304. Troy: 241. Ole Miss: 343. Vanderbilt: 212. Kentucky: 126. Florida: 223. Tennessee: 184
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 59 by 62. West Virginia: 36 by 54.5. Southeast Missouri State: 22 by 69.7. South Carolina: 50 by 62. Troy: 25 by 73.4. Ole Miss: 45 by 61.7. Vanderbilt: 42 by 56.1. Kentucky: 27 by 52.4. Florida: 54 by 52.5. Tennessee: 38 by 56.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Wyoming
Best efficiency game
73.4 vs Troy
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/24 | vs Tennessee | L 20-24 | 16 | 28 | 166 | 57.1 | 1 | 0 | 56.1 | 10 | 18 | 1.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Florida | L 6-23 | 25 | 39 | 204 | 64.1 | 0 | 1 | 52.5 | 15 | 19 | 1.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Kentucky | L 7-29 | 10 | 19 | 130 | 52.6 | 1 | 0 | 52.4 | 8 | -4 | -0.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ VanderbiltDual-threat | L 14-21 | 13 | 26 | 140 | 50.0 | 1 | 1 | 56.1 | 16 | 72 | 4.50 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Ole Miss300-yard game | W 38-27 | 23 | 35 | 329 | 65.7 | 1 | 1 | 61.7 | 10 | 14 | 1.40 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Troy3+ TD | W 42-10 | 12 | 19 | 221 | 63.2 | 3 | 0 | 73.4 | 6 | 20 | 3.30 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs South CarolinaDual-threat | W 34-14 | 19 | 33 | 227 | 57.6 | 2 | 1 | 62 | 17 | 77 | 4.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Southeast Missouri State | W 50-0 | 15 | 20 | 225 | 75.0 | 1 | 1 | 69.7 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs West Virginia3+ TD | W 38-7 | 17 | 25 | 150 | 68.0 | 3 | 0 | 54.5 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Wyoming300-yard game | L 31-37 | 31 | 48 | 423 | 64.6 | 2 | 1 | 62 | 11 | 20 | 1.80 | 0 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Clemson
2015-2018
Opening stop
Missouri
2019
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Clemson | 183 | 48.2 | 7.4 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Clemson | 70 | 48.8 | 6.9 | -113 |
| 2017 Postseason | Clemson | 3,467 | 63.4 | 32.8 | 3,397 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Clemson | 3,467 | 63.4 | 32.8 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Clemson | 591 | 67.2 | 21.3 | -2,876 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Missouri | 2,457 | 60 | 26.7 | 1,866 |
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
259
Primary metric
259 total offense with 76.6 efficiency.
#2
Louisville
342
Primary metric
Win with 342 yards of offense and 66.4 efficiency.
342 total offense with 66.4 efficiency.
#3
Virginia Tech
280
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
280 total offense with 70.1 efficiency.
#4
NC State
279
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
279 total offense with 57 efficiency.
#5
Kent State
313
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
313 total offense with 86 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Postseason · Clemson
3,467 primary output · 63.4 efficiency · 32.8 usage
70.8
#2
2017 Regular Season · Clemson
70.8
3,467 primary · 63.4 efficiency · 32.8 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Missouri
58.2
2,457 primary · 60 efficiency · 26.7 usage
5
250+ passing yards
5
300+ total offense
5
3+ TD games
22
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
6,768
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.