Usage Score
31.5
Player Dossier
2015-2019Wake Forest
WR • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Durham, NC, USA
Kendall Hinton reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
31.5
Efficiency
81
Consistency
65.5
Season Value
69.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Wake Forest
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kendall Hinton, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Wake Forest. Kendall Hinton reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kendall Hinton played WR for Wake Forest. Across 5 tracked seasons, Kendall Hinton recorded 1,504 passing yards, 879 rushing yards, and 1,062 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Wake Forest.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Wake Forest paired 1,001 primary output with 81 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
91
Efficiency
81
Usage
31.5
Consistency
65.5
Best Game by takeover score
Duke
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 48. Utah State: 66. Rice: 44. Boston College: 67. Louisville: 134. Florida State: 93. NC State: 93. Virginia Tech: 162. Clemson: 17. Duke: 189. Syracuse: 88
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 3 by 100. Utah State: 9 by 48.9. Rice: 2 by 100. Boston College: 6 by 74.4. Louisville: 13 by 68.7. Florida State: 7 by 88.6. NC State: 6 by 100. Virginia Tech: 8 by 100. Clemson: 2 by 56.7. Duke: 6 by 100. Syracuse: 11 by 53.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Duke
Best efficiency game
100 vs Michigan State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/27 | vs Michigan State | L 21-27 | — | 3 | 48 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ SyracuseHigh volume | L 30-39 | — | 11 | 88 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 18 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Duke100 receiving yards | W 39-27 | — | 6 | 189 | 27.9 | 31.50 | 1 | 62 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Clemson | L 3-52 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Virginia Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | L 17-36 | — | 8 | 162 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs NC State | W 44-10 | — | 6 | 93 | 13.4 | 15.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Florida State | W 22-20 | — | 7 | 93 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Louisville100 receiving yards · High volume | L 59-62 | — | 13 | 134 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Boston College | W 27-24 | — | 6 | 67 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Rice | W 41-21 | — | 2 | 44 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Utah StateHigh volume | W 38-35 | — | 9 | 66 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 1 | 18 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wake Forest
2015-2019
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | 0.4 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | 0.2 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | 0.2 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Wake Forest | 61 | 67.8 | 16.2 | 61 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 61 | 67.8 | 16.2 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Wake Forest | 1,001 | 81 | 31.5 | 940 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 1,001 | 81 | 31.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Duke
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
189
Primary metric
189 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Virginia Tech
162
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
162 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Memphis
38
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 84.4 efficiency score.
#4
Louisville
134
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
134 receiving yards with a 68.7 efficiency score.
#5
NC State
93
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2019 Postseason · Wake Forest
1,001 primary output · 81 efficiency · 31.5 usage
69.5
#2
2019 Regular Season · Wake Forest
69.5
1,001 primary · 81 efficiency · 31.5 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Wake Forest
50.2
0 primary · — efficiency · 0.4 usage
3
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,062
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.