Usage Score
7.4
Player Dossier
2014-2017Toledo
LB • 5'11" • 228 lbs • Columbus, OH, USA
Ja'Wuan Woodley shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.2 disruption score.
Usage Score
7.4
Efficiency
29.2
Consistency
59.7
Season Value
35.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Toledo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ja'Wuan Woodley, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Toledo. Ja'Wuan Woodley shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.2 disruption score.
Ja'Wuan Woodley played LB for Toledo. Across 4 tracked seasons, Ja'Wuan Woodley recorded 145 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Toledo.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Toledo paired 23.5 primary output with 43.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 29.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
29.2
Usage
7.4
Consistency
59.7
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. App State: 1. Elon: 2. Nevada: 1. Tulsa: 2. Miami: 1. Eastern Michigan: 0.5. Central Michigan: 1. Akron: 0. Ball State: 0. Northern Illinois: 1. Ohio: 0. Western Michigan: 1. Akron: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. App State: 7 by 39.2. Elon: 5 by 40.8. Nevada: 2 by 18.3. Tulsa: 6 by 45. Miami: 8 by 43.3. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 21.7. Central Michigan: 1 by 14.2. Akron: 2 by 8.3. Ball State: 2 by 8.3. Northern Illinois: 5 by 30.8. Ohio: 7 by 29.2. Western Michigan: 9 by 47.5. Akron: 8 by 33.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
47.5 vs Western Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/24 | vs App State | L 0-34 | 7 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/2 | vs Akron | W 45-28 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/24 | vs Western Michigan | W 37-10 | 9 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/9 | @ Ohio | L 10-38 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/2 | vs Northern Illinois | W 27-17 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 10/26 | @ Ball State | W 58-17 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Akron | W 48-21 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Central Michigan | W 30-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 20-15 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Miami | L 30-52 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs TulsaSplash game | W 54-51 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Nevada | W 37-24 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 8/31 | vs ElonSplash game | W 47-13 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Toledo
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Toledo | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Postseason | Toledo | 23.5 | 43.4 | 12 | 22.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Toledo | 23.5 | 43.4 | 12 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Toledo | 10.5 | 29.2 | 7.4 | -13 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Toledo | 10.5 | 29.2 | 7.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Ohio
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 65.3 takeover score.
#2
Akron
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 60.3 takeover score.
#3
Massachusetts
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#4
Tulsa
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.3 takeover score.
#5
Elon
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.9 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Toledo
23.5 primary output · 43.4 efficiency · 12 usage
52.6
#2
2016 Regular Season · Toledo
52.6
23.5 primary · 43.4 efficiency · 12 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Toledo
50
0 primary · 0 efficiency · — usage
3
Impact games
8
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
145
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.