Player Stats

Montez Sweat College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
98
TFL
26.5
Sacks
19
QB hurries
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonMississippi State00-0--0-
2016 Regular SeasonMississippi State00-0--0-
2017 PostseasonMississippi State13431--073.2
2017 Regular SeasonMississippi State134412.59.54-073.2
2018 PostseasonMississippi State1220.50.5--066.9
2018 Regular SeasonMississippi State124810.585-066.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

Mississippi State paired 30 primary output with 38.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 37.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Stephen F. Austin

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Mississippi State

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

2.0

Efficiency

37.4

Usage

10.6

Consistency

60

Best Game by takeover score

Stephen F. Austin

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 1. Stephen F. Austin: 5.5. Kansas State: 4. Louisiana: 1. Kentucky: 3. Florida: 1. LSU: 2. Texas A&M: 2. Louisiana Tech: 2. Alabama: 0. Arkansas: 0. Ole Miss: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 2 by 18.3. Stephen F. Austin: 6 by 75. Kansas State: 3 by 52.5. Louisiana: 2 by 18.3. Kentucky: 6 by 55. Florida: 4 by 26.7. LSU: 7 by 49.2. Texas A&M: 2 by 28.3. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 32.5. Alabama: 5 by 20.8. Arkansas: 4 by 16.7. Ole Miss: 6 by 55

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.5 · Games = 7 · +1.1 vs Losses
Losses1.4 · Games = 5 · -1.1 vs Wins