Usage Score
10.6
Player Dossier
2015-2018Mississippi State
DE • 6'6" • 245 lbs • Stone Mountain, GA, USA
Montez Sweat shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.4 disruption score.
Usage Score
10.6
Efficiency
37.4
Consistency
60
Season Value
47.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Mississippi State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Montez Sweat, DE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Mississippi State. Montez Sweat shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.4 disruption score.
Montez Sweat played DE for Mississippi State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Montez Sweat recorded 98 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Mississippi State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Mississippi State paired 30 primary output with 38.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 37.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Stephen F. Austin
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
2.0
Efficiency
37.4
Usage
10.6
Consistency
60
Best Game by takeover score
Stephen F. Austin
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 1. Stephen F. Austin: 5.5. Kansas State: 4. Louisiana: 1. Kentucky: 3. Florida: 1. LSU: 2. Texas A&M: 2. Louisiana Tech: 2. Alabama: 0. Arkansas: 0. Ole Miss: 3
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 2 by 18.3. Stephen F. Austin: 6 by 75. Kansas State: 3 by 52.5. Louisiana: 2 by 18.3. Kentucky: 6 by 55. Florida: 4 by 26.7. LSU: 7 by 49.2. Texas A&M: 2 by 28.3. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 32.5. Alabama: 5 by 20.8. Arkansas: 4 by 16.7. Ole Miss: 6 by 55
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Stephen F. Austin
Best efficiency game
75 vs Stephen F. Austin
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | @ Iowa | L 22-27 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/23 | @ Ole MissSplash game | W 35-3 | 6 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Arkansas | W 52-6 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Alabama | L 0-24 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Louisiana TechSplash game | W 45-3 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Texas A&MSplash game | W 28-13 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ LSUSplash game | L 3-19 | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Florida | L 6-13 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | @ KentuckySplash game | L 7-28 | 6 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Louisiana | W 56-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Kansas StateSplash game | W 31-10 | 3 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Stephen F. Austin2+ sacks · Splash game | W 63-6 | 6 | 2 | — | 3.50 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Mississippi State
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Mississippi State | 30 | 38.5 | 13.6 | 30 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 30 | 38.5 | 13.6 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Mississippi State | 24.5 | 37.4 | 10.6 | -5.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 24.5 | 37.4 | 10.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Kentucky
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 67.3 takeover score.
#2
Stephen F. Austin
5.5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5.5 disruption/tackle impact with 63.5 takeover score.
#3
Arkansas
5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 63.2 takeover score.
#4
BYU
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 59.5 takeover score.
#5
Texas A&M
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 54.5 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Postseason · Mississippi State
30 primary output · 38.5 efficiency · 13.6 usage
51.6
#2
2017 Regular Season · Mississippi State
51.6
30 primary · 38.5 efficiency · 13.6 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Mississippi State
47.4
24.5 primary · 37.4 efficiency · 10.6 usage
3
Impact games
14
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
98
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.