Usage Score
5.8
Player Dossier
2014-2017Washington
Vita Vea
DL • 6'5" • 340 lbs • Milpitas, CA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Vita Vea shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
26.1
Consistency
32.1
Season Value
24.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Washington
141516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Washington
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Vita Vea, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Washington. Vita Vea shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Washington paired 12.5 primary output with 20.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 26.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Washington
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.1
Efficiency
26.1
Usage
5.8
Consistency
32.1
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 0. Rutgers: 0. Unknown: 2. Fresno State: 0. Colorado: 0. Oregon State: 0. California: 3. UCLA: 4. Oregon: 1. Stanford: 0. Utah: 1. Washington State: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 6 by 25. Rutgers: 4 by 16.7. Unknown: 2 by 28.3. Fresno State: 3 by 12.5. Colorado: 4 by 16.7. Oregon State: 3 by 12.5. California: 2 by 38.3. UCLA: 3 by 52.5. Oregon: 3 by 22.5. Stanford: 6 by 25. Utah: 6 by 35. Washington State: 2 by 28.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.2 · Games = 9 · +1.2 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 2 · -1.2 vs Wins
First Half0.3 · Games = 6 · -1.5 vs Second Half
Second Half1.8 · Games = 6 · +1.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UCLA
Best efficiency game
52.5 vs UCLA
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/30 | @ Penn State | L 28-35 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/26 | vs Washington State | W 41-14 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/19 | vs Utah | W 33-30 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Stanford | L 22-30 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/5 | vs Oregon | W 38-3 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs UCLA | W 44-23 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 10/8 | vs California | W 38-7 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 10/1 | @ Oregon State | W 42-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/24 | @ Colorado | W 37-10 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/17 | vs Fresno State | W 48-16 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Rutgers | W 30-14 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Washington | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Washington | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Washington | 12.5 | 20.5 | 5.5 | 12.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Washington | 12.5 | 20.5 | 5.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Washington | 13 | 26.1 | 5.8 | 0.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Washington | 13 | 26.1 | 5.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCLA
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55.1 takeover score.
#2
Idaho
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52 takeover score.
#3
California
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 40.3 takeover score.
#4
Alabama
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 38.1 takeover score.
#5
Rutgers
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 36.9 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Washington
12.5 primary output · 20.5 efficiency · 5.5 usage
25.7
#2
2016 Regular Season · Washington
25.7
12.5 primary · 20.5 efficiency · 5.5 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Washington
24.3
13 primary · 26.1 efficiency · 5.8 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8178
Union City · Irvington, NJ
- Committed To
- Western Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
83
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.