Usage Score
9.5
Player Dossier
2014-2017UCLA
TE • 6'2" • 230 lbs • Hollywood, FL, USA
Austin Roberts reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9.5
Efficiency
67.8
Consistency
59.5
Season Value
55.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · UCLA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Austin Roberts, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · UCLA. Austin Roberts reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
UCLA paired 220 primary output with 67.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 67.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: USC
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
27.5
Efficiency
67.8
Usage
9.5
Consistency
59.5
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: -1. Memphis: 28. Stanford: 8. Colorado: 42. Arizona: 28. Oregon: 0. Arizona State: 45. USC: 70
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 1 by 0. Memphis: 2 by 93.3. Stanford: 1 by 53.3. Colorado: 2 by 100. Arizona: 1 by 100. Arizona State: 6 by 50. USC: 6 by 77.8
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
USC
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arizona
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UCLA
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | UCLA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | UCLA | 19 | 100 | 3.6 | 19 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UCLA | 261 | 66 | 8.3 | 242 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UCLA | 220 | 67.8 | 9.5 | -41 |
#1 Featured game
Arizona State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
106
Primary metric
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oregon State
19
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
USC
70
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 77.8 efficiency score.
#4
Colorado
57
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Colorado
42
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · UCLA
220 primary output · 67.8 efficiency · 9.5 usage
55.1
#2
2015 Regular Season · UCLA
52.7
19 primary · 100 efficiency · 3.6 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · UCLA
49.4
261 primary · 66 efficiency · 8.3 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.9308
Carmel · Carmel, IN
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
500
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Austin Roberts quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit