Player Stats

Kyran Mitchell College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
221
TFL
35.5
Sacks
12
QB hurries
6
Passes defended
8

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonSMU00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonSMU10-0--041.3
2016 Regular SeasonSMU12675.53.532054.7
2017 PostseasonSMU13310--074.9
2017 Regular SeasonSMU137014.54.523074.9
2018 Regular SeasonSMU128114.5413073.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

SMU paired 26 primary output with 43.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 46.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Houston

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · SMU

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

1.9

Efficiency

46.9

Usage

12.1

Consistency

59.2

Best Game by takeover score

Houston

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 1.5. TCU: 1. Michigan: 0. Navy: 2. Houston Christian: 1.5. UCF: 1. Tulane: 1.5. Cincinnati: 3. Houston: 5. UConn: 3. Memphis: 2.5. Tulsa: 0.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Texas: 8 by 48.3. TCU: 1 by 14.2. Michigan: 5 by 20.8. Navy: 8 by 53.3. Houston Christian: 7 by 44.2. UCF: 6 by 35. Tulane: 8 by 48.3. Cincinnati: 10 by 71.7. Houston: 7 by 79.2. UConn: 8 by 63.3. Memphis: 5 by 45.8. Tulsa: 8 by 38.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.6 · Games = 5 · +1.2 vs Losses
Losses1.4 · Games = 7 · -1.2 vs Wins