Usage Score
13.7
Player Dossier
2014-2018SMU
LB • 6'0" • 225 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Kyran Mitchell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 46 disruption score.
Usage Score
13.7
Efficiency
46
Consistency
60.2
Season Value
36.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · SMU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kyran Mitchell, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · SMU. Kyran Mitchell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 46 disruption score.
Kyran Mitchell played LB for SMU. Across 5 tracked seasons, Kyran Mitchell recorded 1 receiving yards and 221 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with SMU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
SMU paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 46 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.8
Efficiency
46
Usage
13.7
Consistency
60.2
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 1.5. TCU: 1. Michigan: 0. Navy: 2. Unknown: 1.5. UCF: 1. Tulane: 1.5. Cincinnati: 3. Houston: 5. UConn: 2. Memphis: 2.5. Tulsa: 0.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Texas: 8 by 48.3. TCU: 1 by 14.2. Michigan: 5 by 20.8. Navy: 8 by 53.3. Unknown: 7 by 44.2. UCF: 6 by 35. Tulane: 8 by 48.3. Cincinnati: 10 by 71.7. Houston: 7 by 79.2. UConn: 8 by 53.3. Memphis: 5 by 45.8. Tulsa: 8 by 38.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
79.2 vs Houston
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | @ Tulsa | L 24-27 | 8 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Memphis | L 18-28 | 5 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | @ UConn | W 62-50 | 8 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Houston2+ sacks · Splash game | W 45-31 | 7 | 7 | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Cincinnati10+ tackles · Splash game | L 20-26 | 10 | 9 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Tulane | W 27-23 | 8 | 2 | — | 1 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ UCF | L 20-48 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Unknown | — | 7 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Navy | W 31-30 | 8 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Michigan | L 20-45 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs TCU | L 12-42 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | @ North Texas | L 23-46 | 8 | 5 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
SMU
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | SMU | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | SMU | 11 | 32.4 | 9.4 | 10 |
| 2017 Postseason | SMU | 24 | 41.9 | 12.5 | 13 |
| 2017 Regular Season | SMU | 24 | 41.9 | 12.5 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | SMU | 21.5 | 46 | 13.7 | -2.5 |
#1 Featured game
Houston
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 69.6 takeover score.
#2
North Texas
5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 62.3 takeover score.
#3
Cincinnati
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 60.8 takeover score.
#4
East Carolina
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#5
East Carolina
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 59.6 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · SMU
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
40.4
#2
2018 Regular Season · SMU
36.5
21.5 primary · 46 efficiency · 13.7 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · SMU
34.5
24 primary · 41.9 efficiency · 12.5 usage
4
Impact games
7
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7483
Lamar · Houston, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
221
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.