Usage Score
13.7
Player Dossier
2014-2018SMU
Kyran Mitchell
LB • 6'0" • 225 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Kyran Mitchell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 46 disruption score.
Efficiency
46
Consistency
60.2
Season Value
36.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · SMU
141516171718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- SMU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kyran Mitchell, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · SMU. Kyran Mitchell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 46 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
SMU paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 46 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · SMU
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.8
Efficiency
46
Usage
13.7
Consistency
60.2
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 1.5. TCU: 1. Michigan: 0. Navy: 2. Unknown: 1.5. UCF: 1. Tulane: 1.5. Cincinnati: 3. Houston: 5. UConn: 2. Memphis: 2.5. Tulsa: 0.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Texas: 8 by 48.3. TCU: 1 by 14.2. Michigan: 5 by 20.8. Navy: 8 by 53.3. Unknown: 7 by 44.2. UCF: 6 by 35. Tulane: 8 by 48.3. Cincinnati: 10 by 71.7. Houston: 7 by 79.2. UConn: 8 by 53.3. Memphis: 5 by 45.8. Tulsa: 8 by 38.3
Split Comparison
Wins2.6 · n=4 · +1.3 vs Losses
Losses1.4 · n=7 · -1.3 vs Wins
First Half1.2 · n=6 · -1.2 vs Second Half
Second Half2.4 · n=6 · +1.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
79.2 vs Houston
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | @ Tulsa | L 24-27 | 8 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Memphis | L 18-28 | 5 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | @ UConn | W 62-50 | 8 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Houston2+ sacks · Splash game | W 45-31 | 7 | 7 | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Cincinnati10+ tackles · Splash game | L 20-26 | 10 | 9 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Tulane | W 27-23 | 8 | 2 | — | 1 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ UCF | L 20-48 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Unknown | — | 7 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Navy | W 31-30 | 8 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Michigan | L 20-45 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs TCU | L 12-42 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | @ North Texas | L 23-46 | 8 | 5 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
SMU
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201720172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | SMU | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | SMU | 11 | 32.4 | 9.4 | 10 |
| 2017 Postseason | SMU | 24 | 41.9 | 12.5 | 13 |
| 2017 Regular Season | SMU | 24 | 41.9 | 12.5 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | SMU | 21.5 | 46 | 13.7 | -2.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Houston
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 69.6 takeover score.
#2
North Texas
5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 62.3 takeover score.
#3
Cincinnati
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 60.8 takeover score.
#4
East Carolina
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#5
East Carolina
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 59.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · SMU
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
40.4
#2
2018 Regular Season · SMU
36.5
21.5 primary · 46 efficiency · 13.7 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · SMU
34.5
24 primary · 41.9 efficiency · 12.5 usage
Milestones
4
Impact games
7
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7483
Lamar · Houston, TX
- Committed To
- SMU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
221
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.