Usage Score
25.5
Player Dossier
2014-2017Washington
WR • 6'1" • 195 lbs • San Clemente, CA, USA
Dante Pettis reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
25.5
Efficiency
75.5
Consistency
67.6
Season Value
63.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Washington
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dante Pettis, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Washington. Dante Pettis reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Washington paired 822 primary output with 83.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oregon
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 76.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
58.5
Efficiency
75.5
Usage
25.5
Consistency
67.6
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 40. Rutgers: 85. Unknown: 32. Fresno State: 92. Colorado: 54. Oregon State: 105. California: 48. Arizona State: 56. UCLA: 12. Oregon: 87. Stanford: 41. Utah: 94. Washington State: 15
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 1 by 100. Rutgers: 3 by 100. Unknown: 4 by 53.3. Fresno State: 5 by 100. Colorado: 3 by 100. Oregon State: 12 by 58.3. California: 10 by 32. Arizona State: 7 by 53.3. UCLA: 1 by 80. Oregon: 4 by 100. Stanford: 5 by 54.7. Utah: 6 by 100. Washington State: 2 by 50
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oregon
Best efficiency game
100 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/30 | @ Penn State | L 28-35 | — | 1 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 0 | 26 |
| Sun 11/26 | vs Washington State | W 41-14 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 11/19 | vs Utah | W 33-30 | — | 6 | 94 | 16 | 15.70 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Stanford | L 22-30 | — | 5 | 41 | 6.7 | 8.20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 11/5 | vs Oregon | W 38-3 | — | 4 | 87 | 21.8 | 21.80 | 1 | 47 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs UCLA | W 44-23 | — | 1 | 12 | 29 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 10/15 | @ Arizona State | L 7-13 | — | 7 | 56 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 10/8 | vs CaliforniaHigh volume | W 38-7 | — | 10 | 48 | 4.8 | 4.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 10/1 | @ Oregon State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 42-7 | — | 12 | 105 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 3 | 34 |
| Sun 9/24 | @ Colorado | W 37-10 | — | 3 | 54 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 9/17 | vs Fresno State2+ TD | W 48-16 | — | 5 | 92 | 18.4 | 18.40 | 3 | 73 |
| Sun 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Rutgers | W 30-14 | — | 3 | 85 | 28.3 | 28.30 | 0 | 51 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Washington
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | Washington | 259 | 75.2 | 10 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Washington | 259 | 75.2 | 10 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Washington | 414 | 82.7 | 12.3 | 155 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Washington | 414 | 82.7 | 12.3 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Washington | 822 | 83.5 | 21.3 | 408 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Washington | 822 | 83.5 | 21.3 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Washington | 761 | 75.5 | 25.5 | -61 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Washington | 761 | 75.5 | 25.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Oregon
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
134
Primary metric
134 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oregon
65
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Oregon
87
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Colorado
76
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Utah
94
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Washington
822 primary output · 83.5 efficiency · 21.3 usage
64.1
#2
2016 Regular Season · Washington
64.1
822 primary · 83.5 efficiency · 21.3 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Washington
63.2
761 primary · 75.5 efficiency · 25.5 usage
5
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
7
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8481
JSerra Catholic · San Juan Capistrano, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,256
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 52 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Dante Pettis quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit