Player Stats

Deebo Samuel College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,076
Receptions
148
Touchdowns
32

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina0-00-
2015 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina512161146.3
2016 PostseasonSouth Carolina1014190282.9
2016 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina1045593882.9
2017 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina315250869.5
2018 Regular SeasonSouth Carolina12628821376

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

South Carolina paired 783 primary output with 84.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 69.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Clemson

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · South Carolina

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

73.5

Efficiency

69.8

Usage

24.6

Consistency

52.3

Best Game by takeover score

Clemson

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Coastal Carolina: 56. Georgia: 33. Vanderbilt: 56. Kentucky: 61. Missouri: 88. Texas A&M: 88. Tennessee: 8. Ole Miss: 17. Florida: 120. Chattanooga: 112. Clemson: 210. Akron: 33

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Coastal Carolina: 7 by 53.3. Georgia: 6 by 36.7. Vanderbilt: 7 by 53.3. Kentucky: 2 by 100. Missouri: 4 by 100. Texas A&M: 7 by 83.8. Tennessee: 3 by 17.8. Ole Miss: 3 by 37.8. Florida: 4 by 100. Chattanooga: 5 by 100. Clemson: 10 by 100. Akron: 4 by 55

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins52.9 · Games = 7 · -49.5 vs Losses
Losses102.4 · Games = 5 · +49.5 vs Wins