Usage Score
24.6
Player Dossier
2014-2018South Carolina
WR • 6'0" • 210 lbs • Inman, SC, USA
Deebo Samuel reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
24.6
Efficiency
69.8
Consistency
52.3
Season Value
60.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · South Carolina
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Deebo Samuel, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · South Carolina. Deebo Samuel reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Deebo Samuel played WR for South Carolina. Across 5 tracked seasons, Deebo Samuel recorded 46 passing yards, 154 rushing yards, and 2,076 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2018 with South Carolina.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
South Carolina paired 783 primary output with 84.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 69.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Clemson
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
73.5
Efficiency
69.8
Usage
24.6
Consistency
52.3
Best Game by takeover score
Akron
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Coastal Carolina: 56. Georgia: 33. Vanderbilt: 56. Kentucky: 61. Missouri: 88. Texas A&M: 88. Tennessee: 8. Ole Miss: 17. Florida: 120. Unknown: 112. Clemson: 210. Akron: 33
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Coastal Carolina: 7 by 53.3. Georgia: 6 by 36.7. Vanderbilt: 7 by 53.3. Kentucky: 2 by 100. Missouri: 4 by 100. Texas A&M: 7 by 83.8. Tennessee: 3 by 17.8. Ole Miss: 3 by 37.8. Florida: 4 by 100. Unknown: 5 by 100. Clemson: 10 by 100. Akron: 4 by 55
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Clemson
Best efficiency game
100 vs Clemson
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/1 | vs Akron2+ TD | W 28-3 | — | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 2 | 15 |
| Sun 11/25 | @ Clemson100 receiving yards · High volume | L 35-56 | — | 10 | 210 | 21 | 21 | 3 | 75 |
| Sun 11/18 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 5 | 112 | 19 | 22.40 | 1 | 61 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Florida100 receiving yards | L 31-35 | — | 4 | 120 | 24.6 | 30 | 0 | 89 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Ole Miss | W 48-44 | — | 3 | 17 | 5.7 | 5.70 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Tennessee | W 27-24 | — | 3 | 8 | 3.2 | 2.70 | 1 | 5 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Texas A&M | L 23-26 | — | 7 | 88 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Missouri | W 37-35 | — | 4 | 88 | 15.2 | 22 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Kentucky | L 10-24 | — | 2 | 61 | 30.5 | 30.50 | 1 | 58 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Vanderbilt | W 37-14 | — | 7 | 56 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Georgia | L 17-41 | — | 6 | 33 | 4.6 | 5.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Coastal Carolina | W 49-15 | — | 7 | 56 | 8.4 | 8 | 1 | 15 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
South Carolina
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | South Carolina | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | South Carolina | 161 | 69.6 | 19 | 161 |
| 2016 Postseason | South Carolina | 783 | 84.6 | 30.1 | 622 |
| 2016 Regular Season | South Carolina | 783 | 84.6 | 30.1 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | South Carolina | 250 | 86.7 | 26 | -533 |
| 2018 Regular Season | South Carolina | 882 | 69.8 | 24.6 | 632 |
#1 Featured game
Clemson
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
104
Primary metric
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Florida
190
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
190 receiving yards with a 90.5 efficiency score.
#3
Clemson
210
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
210 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kentucky
122
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Missouri
125
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
125 receiving yards with a 92.6 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · South Carolina
783 primary output · 84.6 efficiency · 30.1 usage
64.2
#2
2016 Regular Season · South Carolina
64.2
783 primary · 84.6 efficiency · 30.1 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · South Carolina
60.3
882 primary · 69.8 efficiency · 24.6 usage
8
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8506
Chapman Hi · Inman, SC
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,076
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.