Usage Score
24.6
Player Profile
Deebo Samuel
WR • 6'0" • 210 lbs • Inman, SC, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Deebo Samuel reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
69.8
Consistency
52.3
Season Value
60.3
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · South Carolina
141516161718
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- South Carolina
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · South Carolina
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Clemson
Deebo Samuel, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · South Carolina. Deebo Samuel reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
South Carolina paired 783 primary output with 84.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 69.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Clemson
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · South Carolina
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
73.5
Efficiency
69.8
Usage
24.6
Consistency
52.3
Best Game by takeover score
Akron
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Coastal Carolina: 56. Georgia: 33. Vanderbilt: 56. Kentucky: 61. Missouri: 88. Texas A&M: 88. Tennessee: 8. Ole Miss: 17. Florida: 120. Unknown: 112. Clemson: 210. Akron: 33
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Coastal Carolina: 7 by 53.3. Georgia: 6 by 36.7. Vanderbilt: 7 by 53.3. Kentucky: 2 by 100. Missouri: 4 by 100. Texas A&M: 7 by 83.8. Tennessee: 3 by 17.8. Ole Miss: 3 by 37.8. Florida: 4 by 100. Unknown: 5 by 100. Clemson: 10 by 100. Akron: 4 by 55
Split Comparison
Wins43 · n=6 · -59.4 vs Losses
Losses102.4 · n=5 · +59.4 vs Wins
First Half63.7 · n=6 · -19.7 vs Second Half
Second Half83.3 · n=6 · +19.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Clemson
Best efficiency game
100 vs Clemson
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/1 | vs Akron2+ TD | W 28-3 | — | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 2 | 15 |
| Sun 11/25 | @ Clemson100 receiving yards · High volume | L 35-56 | — | 10 | 210 | 21 | 21 | 3 | 75 |
| Sun 11/18 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 5 | 112 | 19 | 22.40 | 1 | 61 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Florida100 receiving yards | L 31-35 | — | 4 | 120 | 24.6 | 30 | 0 | 89 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Ole Miss | W 48-44 | — | 3 | 17 | 5.7 | 5.70 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Tennessee | W 27-24 | — | 3 | 8 | 3.2 | 2.70 | 1 | 5 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Texas A&M | L 23-26 | — | 7 | 88 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Missouri | W 37-35 | — | 4 | 88 | 15.2 | 22 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Kentucky | L 10-24 | — | 2 | 61 | 30.5 | 30.50 | 1 | 58 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Vanderbilt | W 37-14 | — | 7 | 56 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Georgia | L 17-41 | — | 6 | 33 | 4.6 | 5.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Coastal Carolina | W 49-15 | — | 7 | 56 | 8.4 | 8 | 1 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
South Carolina
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | South Carolina | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | South Carolina | 161 | 69.6 | 19 | 161 |
| 2016 Postseason | South Carolina | 783 | 84.6 | 30.1 | 622 |
| 2016 Regular Season | South Carolina | 783 | 84.6 | 30.1 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | South Carolina | 250 | 86.7 | 26 | -533 |
| 2018 Regular Season | South Carolina | 882 | 69.8 | 24.6 | 632 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Clemson
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
104
Primary metric
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Florida
190
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
190 receiving yards with a 90.5 efficiency score.
#3
Clemson
210
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
210 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kentucky
122
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Missouri
125
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
125 receiving yards with a 92.6 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · South Carolina
783 primary output · 84.6 efficiency · 30.1 usage
64.2
#2
2016 Regular Season · South Carolina
64.2
783 primary · 84.6 efficiency · 30.1 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · South Carolina
60.3
882 primary · 69.8 efficiency · 24.6 usage
Milestones
8
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8506
Chapman Hi · Inman, SC
- Committed To
- South Carolina
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,076
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.