Usage Score
10.1
Player Dossier
2016-2017Tulsa
LB • 6'2" • 230 lbs • Memphis, TN, USA
Petera Wilson Jr. shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.9 disruption score.
Usage Score
10.1
Efficiency
33.9
Consistency
47.4
Season Value
38.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Tulsa
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Petera Wilson Jr., LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Tulsa. Petera Wilson Jr. shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.9 disruption score.
Petera Wilson Jr. played LB for Tulsa. Across 2 tracked seasons, Petera Wilson Jr. recorded 70 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Tulsa.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Tulsa paired 16.5 primary output with 21.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 33.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 88.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
33.9
Usage
10.1
Consistency
47.4
Best Game by takeover score
Houston
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 2. Toledo: 2. New Mexico: 0. Navy: 0. Tulane: 0. Houston: 2.5. UConn: 0. SMU: 3. Memphis: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 1 by 24.2. Toledo: 3 by 32.5. New Mexico: 17 by 50. Navy: 13 by 50. Tulane: 6 by 25. Houston: 8 by 58.3. UConn: 3 by 12.5. SMU: 2 by 38.3. Memphis: 1 by 14.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
58.3 vs Houston
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/4 | vs Memphis | L 14-41 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ SMUSplash game | L 34-38 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ UConn | L 14-20 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs HoustonSplash game | W 45-17 | 8 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Tulane | L 28-62 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Navy10+ tackles | L 21-31 | 13 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs New Mexico10+ tackles | L 13-16 | 17 | 11 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ ToledoSplash game | L 51-54 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 8/31 | @ Oklahoma StateSplash game | L 24-59 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulsa
2016-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Tulsa | 16.5 | 21.1 | 9.1 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tulsa | 16.5 | 21.1 | 9.1 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Tulsa | 10.5 | 33.9 | 10.1 | -6 |
#1 Featured game
Central Michigan
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.3 takeover score.
#2
Fresno State
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 57.7 takeover score.
#3
Houston
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 52.3 takeover score.
#4
SMU
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.8 takeover score.
#5
San José State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 42.4 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Tulsa
16.5 primary output · 21.1 efficiency · 9.1 usage
41.3
#2
2016 Regular Season · Tulsa
41.3
16.5 primary · 21.1 efficiency · 9.1 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Tulsa
38.8
10.5 primary · 33.9 efficiency · 10.1 usage
0
Impact games
8
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8639
White Station · Memphis, TN
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
70
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.