Usage Score
27.7
Player Dossier
2014-2017Houston
Steven Dunbar
WR • 6'3" • 202 lbs • Metairie, LA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Steven Dunbar reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79.1
Consistency
61.1
Season Value
67
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Houston
1414151516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Houston
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Steven Dunbar, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Houston. Steven Dunbar reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Houston paired 1,070 primary output with 79.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 79.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Houston
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
89.2
Efficiency
79.1
Usage
27.7
Consistency
61.1
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Fresno State: 197. Arizona: 72. Rice: 57. Texas Tech: 83. Temple: 78. SMU: 65. Tulsa: 107. Memphis: 43. South Florida: 19. East Carolina: 171. Tulane: 36. Navy: 142
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Fresno State: 10 by 100. Arizona: 6 by 80. Rice: 6 by 63.3. Texas Tech: 6 by 92.2. Temple: 6 by 86.7. SMU: 6 by 72.2. Tulsa: 10 by 71.3. Memphis: 7 by 41. South Florida: 3 by 42.2. East Carolina: 6 by 100. Tulane: 2 by 100. Navy: 8 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins86.3 · n=7 · -6.9 vs Losses
Losses93.2 · n=5 · +6.9 vs Wins
First Half92 · n=6 · +5.7 vs Second Half
Second Half86.3 · n=6 · -5.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Fresno State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Fresno State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/25 | vs Fresno State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-33 | — | 10 | 197 | 19.7 | 19.70 | 0 | 50 |
| Fri 11/24 | vs Navy100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-14 | — | 8 | 142 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 1 | 61 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Tulane | L 17-20 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs East Carolina100 receiving yards | W 52-27 | — | 6 | 171 | 28.5 | 28.50 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ South Florida | W 28-24 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Fri 10/20 | vs Memphis | L 38-42 | — | 7 | 43 | 6.1 | 6.10 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Tulsa100 receiving yards · High volume | L 17-45 | — | 10 | 107 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs SMU | W 35-22 | — | 6 | 65 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Temple | W 20-13 | — | 6 | 78 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Texas Tech | L 24-27 | — | 6 | 83 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 9/17 | vs Rice | W 38-3 | — | 6 | 57 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 9/10 | @ Arizona | W 19-16 | — | 6 | 72 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Houston
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142014201520152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | Houston | 286 | 75.2 | 16.6 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Houston | 286 | 75.2 | 16.6 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Houston | 382 | 71.1 | 13.1 | 96 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Houston | 382 | 71.1 | 13.1 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Houston | 692 | 76.5 | 15.1 | 310 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Houston | 692 | 76.5 | 15.1 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Houston | 1,070 | 79.1 | 27.7 | 378 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Houston | 1,070 | 79.1 | 27.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
150
Primary metric
150 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Fresno State
197
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
197 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Oklahoma
125
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
East Carolina
171
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
171 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Texas State
80
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Houston
1,070 primary output · 79.1 efficiency · 27.7 usage
67
#2
2017 Regular Season · Houston
67
1,070 primary · 79.1 efficiency · 27.7 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Houston
55.6
692 primary · 76.5 efficiency · 15.1 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7893
Archbishop Rummel · Metairie, LA
- Committed To
- Houston
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,430
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.