Usage Score
0.4
Player Dossier
2014-2016Ohio
S • 5'10" • Galloway, OH, USA
Bo Hardy shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 2.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
0.4
Efficiency
2.3
Consistency
100
Season Value
34.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · Ohio
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bo Hardy, S. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · Ohio. Bo Hardy shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 2.3 disruption score.
Bo Hardy played S for Ohio. Across 3 tracked seasons, Bo Hardy recorded 295 rushing yards, 12 receiving yards, and 6 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Ohio.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Ohio paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 2.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0
Efficiency
2.3
Usage
0.4
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 0. Texas State: 0. Kansas: 0. Tennessee: 0. Gardner-Webb: 0. Miami (OH): 0. Bowling Green: 0. Eastern Michigan: 0. Toledo: 0. Central Michigan: 0. Western Michigan: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas State: 2 by 8.3. Kansas: 2 by 8.3. Tennessee: 1 by 4.2. Central Michigan: 1 by 4.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Kansas
Best efficiency game
8.3 vs Kansas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/24 | @ Troy | L 23-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 12/3 | vs Western Michigan | L 23-29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Wed 11/16 | @ Central Michigan | L 20-27 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/27 | @ Toledo | W 31-26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Eastern Michigan | L 20-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Bowling Green | W 30-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Miami (OH) | W 17-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Gardner-Webb | W 37-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Tennessee | L 19-28 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Kansas | W 37-21 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Texas State | L 54-56 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Ohio | 0 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Kansas
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0
Primary metric
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.6 takeover score.
#2
Texas State
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.1 takeover score.
#3
Central Michigan
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.7 takeover score.
#4
Tennessee
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.6 takeover score.
#5
Kent State
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 0 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Regular Season · Ohio
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2016 Postseason · Ohio
34.2
0 primary · 2.3 efficiency · 0.4 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Ohio
34.2
0 primary · 2.3 efficiency · 0.4 usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
6
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.