Usage Score
14.9
Player Dossier
2014-2014Massachusetts
TE • 6'7" • Miami, FL, USA
Jean Sifrin reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
14.9
Efficiency
77.2
Consistency
40.8
Season Value
58.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2014 Regular Season · Massachusetts
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jean Sifrin, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2014 Regular Season · Massachusetts. Jean Sifrin reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jean Sifrin played TE for Massachusetts. Across 1 tracked season, Jean Sifrin recorded 637 receiving yards and 6 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2014 with Massachusetts.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Massachusetts paired 637 primary output with 77.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 77.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
57.9
Efficiency
77.2
Usage
14.9
Consistency
40.8
Best Game by takeover score
Toledo
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Colorado: 40. Vanderbilt: 10. Penn State: 9. Bowling Green: 135. Miami (OH): 67. Kent State: 24. Eastern Michigan: 74. Toledo: 185. Ball State: 49. Akron: 23. Buffalo: 21
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Colorado: 4 by 66.7. Vanderbilt: 1 by 66.7. Penn State: 1 by 60. Bowling Green: 8 by 100. Miami (OH): 6 by 74.4. Kent State: 3 by 53.3. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 100. Toledo: 6 by 100. Ball State: 4 by 81.7. Akron: 2 by 76.7. Buffalo: 2 by 70
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Toledo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/28 | vs Buffalo | L 21-41 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Wed 11/19 | @ Akron | L 6-30 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 22 |
| Thu 11/13 | vs Ball State | W 24-10 | — | 4 | 49 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Toledo100 receiving yards | L 35-42 | — | 6 | 185 | 30.8 | 30.80 | 1 | 76 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 36-14 | — | 4 | 74 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Kent State | W 40-17 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Miami (OH) | L 41-42 | — | 6 | 67 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Bowling Green100 receiving yards · High volume | L 42-47 | — | 8 | 135 | 16.9 | 16.90 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Penn State | L 7-48 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Vanderbilt | L 31-34 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Colorado2+ TD | L 38-41 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 14 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Massachusetts
2014
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 637 | 77.2 | 14.9 | — |
#1 Featured game
Toledo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
185
Primary metric
185 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Bowling Green
135
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Eastern Michigan
74
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Miami (OH)
67
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 74.4 efficiency score.
#5
Ball State
49
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
49 receiving yards with a 81.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2014 Regular Season · Massachusetts
637 primary output · 77.2 efficiency · 14.9 usage
58.2
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
637
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 11 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.