Usage Score
25.2
Player Dossier
2014-2018Eastern Michigan
WR • 5'9" • 195 lbs • St. Paul, MN, USA
Blake Banham reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
25.2
Efficiency
72.2
Consistency
46.7
Season Value
61
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2018 Postseason · Eastern Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Blake Banham, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2018 Postseason · Eastern Michigan. Blake Banham reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Blake Banham played WR for Eastern Michigan. Across 5 tracked seasons, Blake Banham recorded 450 rushing yards, 951 receiving yards, and 6 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Eastern Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Eastern Michigan paired 758 primary output with 72.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 72.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
58.3
Efficiency
72.2
Usage
25.2
Consistency
46.7
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia Southern: 44. Monmouth: 103. Purdue: 99. Buffalo: 159. San Diego State: 0. Northern Illinois: 26. Western Michigan: 57. Toledo: 21. Ball State: 14. Army: 104. Central Michigan: 99. Akron: 27. Kent State: 5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Southern: 6 by 48.9. Monmouth: 8 by 85.8. Purdue: 6 by 100. Buffalo: 9 by 100. Northern Illinois: 3 by 57.8. Western Michigan: 5 by 76. Toledo: 4 by 35. Ball State: 2 by 46.7. Army: 7 by 99. Central Michigan: 7 by 94.3. Akron: 2 by 90. Kent State: 1 by 33.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Buffalo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/15 | vs Georgia Southern | L 21-23 | — | 6 | 44 | 7 | 7.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Fri 11/23 | @ Kent State | W 28-20 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Akron | W 27-7 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Central Michigan | W 17-7 | — | 7 | 99 | 13 | 14.10 | 1 | 47 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Army100 receiving yards | L 22-37 | — | 7 | 104 | 13.1 | 14.90 | 1 | 58 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Ball State | W 42-20 | — | 2 | 14 | 5.7 | 7 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Toledo | W 28-26 | — | 4 | 21 | 4 | 5.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Western Michigan | L 24-27 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Northern Illinois | L 23-26 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.4 | 8.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 9/23 | @ San Diego State | L 20-23 | — | — | — | 3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Buffalo100 receiving yards · High volume | L 28-35 | — | 9 | 159 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Purdue | W 20-19 | — | 6 | 99 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 29 |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Monmouth100 receiving yards · High volume | W 51-17 | — | 8 | 103 | 12.9 | 12.90 | 1 | 30 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Eastern Michigan
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 28 | 30 | 9.5 | 28 |
| 2016 Postseason | Eastern Michigan | 71 | 65.4 | 13.5 | 43 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 71 | 65.4 | 13.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 94 | 40.6 | 8.5 | 23 |
| 2018 Postseason | Eastern Michigan | 758 | 72.2 | 25.2 | 664 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 758 | 72.2 | 25.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
159
Primary metric
159 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Miami (OH)
45
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Army
104
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 99 efficiency score.
#4
Toledo
25
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#5
Central Michigan
53
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 70.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2018 Postseason · Eastern Michigan
758 primary output · 72.2 efficiency · 25.2 usage
61
#2
2018 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
61
758 primary · 72.2 efficiency · 25.2 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
28
94 primary · 40.6 efficiency · 8.5 usage
3
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
951
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.