Usage Score
21.5
Player Dossier
2014-2015Bowling Green
Roger Lewis
WR • 6'2" • Pickerington, OH, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Roger Lewis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
92.6
Consistency
58.6
Season Value
68.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Bowling Green
14141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Bowling Green
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Roger Lewis, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Bowling Green. Roger Lewis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Bowling Green paired 1,544 primary output with 92.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 92.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Bowling Green
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
110.3
Efficiency
92.6
Usage
21.5
Consistency
58.6
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia Southern
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia Southern: 68. Tennessee: 49. Maryland: 200. Memphis: 261. Purdue: 49. Buffalo: 201. Massachusetts: 142. Akron: 118. Kent State: 102. Ohio: 102. Western Michigan: 86. Toledo: 32. Ball State: 59. Northern Illinois: 75
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Southern: 3 by 100. Tennessee: 2 by 100. Maryland: 15 by 88.9. Memphis: 7 by 100. Purdue: 6 by 54.4. Buffalo: 10 by 100. Massachusetts: 8 by 100. Akron: 6 by 100. Kent State: 4 by 100. Ohio: 6 by 100. Western Michigan: 5 by 100. Toledo: 3 by 71.1. Ball State: 4 by 98.3. Northern Illinois: 6 by 83.3
Split Comparison
Wins113.4 · n=10 · +10.9 vs Losses
Losses102.5 · n=4 · -10.9 vs Wins
First Half138.6 · n=7 · +56.6 vs Second Half
Second Half82 · n=7 · -56.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
100 vs Georgia Southern
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/24 | vs Georgia Southern | L 27-58 | — | 3 | 68 | 22.7 | 22.70 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 12/5 | @ Northern Illinois | W 34-14 | — | 6 | 75 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 45 |
| Wed 11/25 | @ Ball State | W 48-10 | — | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 0 | 38 |
| Tue 11/17 | vs Toledo | L 28-44 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Thu 11/12 | @ Western Michigan2+ TD | W 41-27 | — | 5 | 86 | 17.2 | 17.20 | 2 | 35 |
| Thu 11/5 | vs Ohio100 receiving yards | W 62-24 | — | 6 | 102 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Kent State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 48-0 | — | 4 | 102 | 25.5 | 25.50 | 2 | 64 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Akron100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 59-10 | — | 6 | 118 | 19.7 | 19.70 | 2 | 42 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Massachusetts100 receiving yards · High volume | W 62-38 | — | 8 | 142 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 1 | 68 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Buffalo100 receiving yards · High volume | W 28-22 | — | 10 | 201 | 20.1 | 20.10 | 1 | 61 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Purdue | W 35-28 | — | 6 | 49 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Memphis100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 41-44 | — | 7 | 261 | 37.3 | 37.30 | 3 | 94 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Maryland100 receiving yards · High volume | W 48-27 | — | 15 | 200 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 2 | 58 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Tennessee | L 30-59 | — | 2 | 49 | 24.5 | 24.50 | 0 | 45 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Bowling Green
2014-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
2014201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | Bowling Green | 1,093 | 78.8 | 22 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 1,093 | 78.8 | 22 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Bowling Green | 1,544 | 92.6 | 21.5 | 451 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 1,544 | 92.6 | 21.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Memphis
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
261
Primary metric
261 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Massachusetts
148
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
148 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
201
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
201 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
140
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
South Alabama
137
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
137 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Bowling Green
1,544 primary output · 92.6 efficiency · 21.5 usage
68.2
#2
2015 Regular Season · Bowling Green
68.2
1,544 primary · 92.6 efficiency · 21.5 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Bowling Green
58.8
1,093 primary · 78.8 efficiency · 22 usage
Milestones
13
100+ receiving yards
6
8+ catch outings
6
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8489
Princeton · Cincinnati, OH
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
2,637
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.