Usage Score
23
Player Dossier
2014-2016BYU
WR • 6'6" • El Cajon, CA, USA
Nick Kurtz reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
23
Efficiency
70.1
Consistency
63.6
Season Value
62.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · BYU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nick Kurtz, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · BYU. Nick Kurtz reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Nick Kurtz played WR for BYU. Across 3 tracked seasons, Nick Kurtz recorded 1,119 receiving yards and 5 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with BYU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
BYU paired 541 primary output with 70.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 70.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 66.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
45.1
Efficiency
70.1
Usage
23
Consistency
63.6
Best Game by takeover score
Wyoming
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 59. Arizona: 9. Utah: 35. UCLA: 83. West Virginia: 78. Michigan State: 27. Mississippi State: 62. Boise State: 16. Cincinnati: 33. Southern Utah: 69. Massachusetts: 20. Utah State: 50
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 3 by 100. Arizona: 1 by 60. Utah: 3 by 77.8. UCLA: 8 by 69.2. West Virginia: 6 by 86.7. Michigan State: 3 by 60. Mississippi State: 7 by 59. Boise State: 2 by 53.3. Cincinnati: 4 by 55. Southern Utah: 5 by 92. Massachusetts: 3 by 44.4. Utah State: 4 by 83.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wyoming
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wyoming
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/22 | @ Wyoming | W 24-21 | — | 3 | 59 | 19.7 | 19.70 | 0 | 39 |
| Sun 11/27 | vs Utah State | W 28-10 | — | 4 | 50 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Massachusetts | W 51-9 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Southern Utah | W 37-7 | — | 5 | 69 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Cincinnati | W 20-3 | — | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 10/21 | @ Boise State | L 27-28 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Mississippi State | W 28-21 | — | 7 | 62 | 8.9 | 8.90 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Michigan State | W 31-14 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ West Virginia | L 32-35 | — | 6 | 78 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 9/18 | vs UCLAHigh volume | L 14-17 | — | 8 | 83 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Utah | L 19-20 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Arizona | W 18-16 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
BYU
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Postseason | BYU | 578 | 80.1 | 13.8 | 578 |
| 2015 Regular Season | BYU | 578 | 80.1 | 13.8 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | BYU | 541 | 70.1 | 23 | -37 |
| 2016 Regular Season | BYU | 541 | 70.1 | 23 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Cincinnati
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
119
Primary metric
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Nebraska
123
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Wyoming
59
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
West Virginia
78
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#5
UCLA
83
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 69.2 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · BYU
541 primary output · 70.1 efficiency · 23 usage
62.6
#2
2016 Regular Season · BYU
62.6
541 primary · 70.1 efficiency · 23 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · BYU
61.4
578 primary · 80.1 efficiency · 13.8 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,119
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.