Usage Score
16.6
Player Dossier
2014-2017Pittsburgh
Adonis Jennings
WR • 6'3" • 205 lbs • Sicklerville, NJ, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Adonis Jennings reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
88.2
Consistency
63.9
Season Value
67.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Temple
141516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Pittsburgh • Temple
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Adonis Jennings, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Temple. Adonis Jennings reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Temple paired 742 primary output with 88.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 88.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Pittsburgh, Temple.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Temple
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
57.1
Efficiency
88.2
Usage
16.6
Consistency
63.9
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 51. Notre Dame: 30. Unknown: 75. Massachusetts: 41. South Florida: 33. Houston: 41. East Carolina: 37. UConn: 52. Army: 62. Navy: 127. Cincinnati: 16. UCF: 88. Tulsa: 89
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 3 by 100. Notre Dame: 2 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 100. Massachusetts: 3 by 91.1. South Florida: 2 by 100. Houston: 4 by 68.3. East Carolina: 3 by 82.2. UConn: 5 by 69.3. Army: 4 by 100. Navy: 5 by 100. Cincinnati: 3 by 35.6. UCF: 2 by 100. Tulsa: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins60.2 · n=6 · +9.2 vs Losses
Losses51 · n=6 · -9.2 vs Wins
First Half44 · n=7 · -28.3 vs Second Half
Second Half72.3 · n=6 · +28.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Navy
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida International
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/22 | @ Florida International | W 28-3 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Tulsa | W 43-22 | — | 3 | 89 | 29.7 | 29.70 | 1 | 65 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs UCF | L 19-45 | — | 2 | 88 | 44 | 44 | 1 | 74 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Cincinnati | W 35-24 | — | 3 | 16 | 4 | 5.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 11/3 | vs Navy100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 34-26 | — | 5 | 127 | 25.4 | 25.40 | 2 | 40 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Army | L 28-31 | — | 4 | 62 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs UConn | L 24-28 | — | 5 | 52 | 12.3 | 10.40 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ East Carolina | W 34-10 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Houston | L 13-20 | — | 4 | 41 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Thu 9/21 | @ South Florida | L 7-43 | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Fri 9/15 | vs Massachusetts | W 29-21 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 75 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Notre Dame | L 16-49 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 20 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Pittsburgh
2014
Opening stop
- 2
Temple
2015-2017
Final stop
Season Progression
201420152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 55 | 55.3 | 8 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Temple | 146 | 63.3 | 11 | 91 |
| 2016 Postseason | Temple | 474 | 81.9 | 17.1 | 328 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Temple | 474 | 81.9 | 17.1 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Temple | 742 | 88.2 | 16.6 | 268 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Temple | 742 | 88.2 | 16.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Wake Forest
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
154
Primary metric
154 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Navy
127
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
East Carolina
100
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Massachusetts
62
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
North Carolina
27
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Temple
742 primary output · 88.2 efficiency · 16.6 usage
67.2
#2
2017 Regular Season · Temple
67.2
742 primary · 88.2 efficiency · 16.6 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Temple
50.6
474 primary · 81.9 efficiency · 17.1 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8958
Timber Creek · Haddonfield, NJ
- Committed To
- Pittsburgh
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,417
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.