Usage Score
4.2
Player Dossier
2014-2015North Texas
QB • 6'5" • Arlington, TX, USA
Josh Greer is a balanced quarterback profile with 4.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
4.2
Efficiency
30.6
Consistency
72
Season Value
44.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2014 Regular Season · North Texas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Josh Greer, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2014 Regular Season · North Texas. Josh Greer is a balanced quarterback profile with 4.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Josh Greer played QB for North Texas. Across 2 tracked seasons, Josh Greer recorded 268 passing yards, -49 rushing yards, and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2014 with North Texas.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
North Texas paired 129 primary output with 38.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 30.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2015 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Loss with 30 yards of offense and 36.7 efficiency. It landed in the 75th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Primary Metric / G
22.5
Efficiency
30.6
Usage
4.2
Consistency
72
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 30. Portland State: 26. Middle Tennessee: 34. UTEP: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 5 by 36.7. Portland State: 11 by 38.8. Middle Tennessee: 9 by 46.7. UTEP: 1 by 0
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Iowa
Best efficiency game
46.7 vs Middle Tennessee
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
North Texas
2014-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | North Texas | 129 | 38.2 | 8.1 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | North Texas | 90 | 30.6 | 4.2 | -39 |
#1 Featured game
Iowa
Loss with 30 yards of offense and 36.7 efficiency.
30
Primary metric
30 total offense with 36.7 efficiency.
#2
SMU
71
Primary metric
Win with 71 yards of offense and 58.7 efficiency.
71 total offense with 58.7 efficiency.
#3
Louisiana Tech
75
Primary metric
Loss with 75 yards of offense and 43 efficiency.
75 total offense with 43 efficiency.
#4
Middle Tennessee
34
Primary metric
Loss with 34 yards of offense and 46.7 efficiency.
34 total offense with 46.7 efficiency.
#5
Portland State
26
Primary metric
Loss with 26 yards of offense and 38.8 efficiency.
26 total offense with 38.8 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2014 Regular Season · North Texas
129 primary output · 38.2 efficiency · 8.1 usage
50.6
#2
2015 Regular Season · North Texas
44.1
90 primary · 30.6 efficiency · 4.2 usage
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ TD games
0
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
219
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 7 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.