Usage Score
8.7
Player Dossier
2014-2018Clemson
Adam Choice
RB • 5'8" • 210 lbs • Thomasville, GA, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Adam Choice leans balanced backfield option traits and 64.5 efficiency.
Efficiency
64.5
Consistency
45.9
Season Value
54.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Clemson
1415161617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Clemson
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Adam Choice, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Clemson. Adam Choice leans balanced backfield option traits and 64.5 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Clemson paired 551 primary output with 64.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 64.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Win with 131 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Clemson
Games
15
Scrimmage Yards / G
36.7
Efficiency
64.5
Usage
8.7
Consistency
45.9
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112131415
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 12. Notre Dame: 30. Unknown: 6. Texas A&M: 27. Georgia Southern: 49. Georgia Tech: 15. Syracuse: 58. Wake Forest: 131. NC State: 8. Florida State: 20. Louisville: 43. Boston College: 19. Duke: 26. South Carolina: 56. Pittsburgh: 51
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 7 by 17.9. Notre Dame: 2 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 31.3. Texas A&M: 3 by 87.5. Georgia Southern: 7 by 72.9. Georgia Tech: 5 by 31.3. Syracuse: 9 by 67.1. Wake Forest: 11 by 99.6. NC State: 3 by 27.8. Florida State: 3 by 69.4. Louisville: 3 by 100. Boston College: 4 by 49.5. Duke: 5 by 54.2. South Carolina: 7 by 83.3. Pittsburgh: 7 by 75.9
Split Comparison
Wins38.9 · n=14
First Half41 · n=8 · +9.1 vs Second Half
Second Half31.9 · n=7 · -9.1 vs First Half
All Games36.7 · n=15
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
15 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Best efficiency game
100 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/8 | @ Alabama | W 44-16 | 7 | 12 | 1.70 | 0 | — | — | 1.7 |
| Sat 12/29 | vs Notre Dame | W 30-3 | 2 | 30 | 15 | 0 | — | — | 15 |
| Sun 12/2 | @ Pittsburgh | W 42-10 | 7 | 51 | 7.30 | 1 | — | — | 7.3 |
| Sun 11/25 | vs South Carolina2+ TD | W 56-35 | 7 | 56 | 8 | 3 | — | — | 8 |
| Sun 11/18 | vs Duke | W 35-6 | 5 | 26 | 5.20 | 0 | — | — | 5.2 |
| Sun 11/11 | @ Boston College | W 27-7 | 4 | 19 | 4.80 | 0 | — | — | 4.8 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Louisville | W 77-16 | 3 | 43 | 14.30 | 0 | — | — | 14.3 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Florida State | W 59-10 | 3 | 20 | 6.70 | 1 | — | — | 6.7 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs NC State | W 41-7 | 3 | 8 | 2.70 | 0 | — | — | 2.7 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Wake Forest100 rush yards | W 63-3 | 10 | 128 | 12.80 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 11.9 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Syracuse | W 27-23 | 9 | 58 | 6.40 | 0 | — | — | 6.4 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Georgia Tech | W 49-21 | 5 | 15 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Georgia Southern | W 38-7 | 7 | 49 | 7 | 1 | — | — | 7 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Texas A&M | W 28-26 | 3 | 27 | 9 | 0 | — | — | 9 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Clemson
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142015201620162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Clemson | 308 | 42.9 | 15.4 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Clemson | 0 | — | — | -308 |
| 2016 Postseason | Clemson | 196 | 37.5 | 7.4 | 196 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Clemson | 196 | 37.5 | 7.4 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Clemson | 374 | 50.9 | 9.6 | 178 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Clemson | 374 | 50.9 | 9.6 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Clemson | 551 | 64.5 | 8.7 | 177 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Clemson | 551 | 64.5 | 8.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Wake Forest
Win with 131 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
131
Primary metric
131 scrimmage yards and 16.9 usage.
#2
Georgia Tech
61
Primary metric
Win with 61 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
61 scrimmage yards and 13.4 usage.
#3
Unknown
89
Primary metric
Game with 89 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
89 scrimmage yards and 17.3 usage.
#4
Louisville
47
Primary metric
Win with 47 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
47 scrimmage yards and 5.6 usage.
#5
NC State
77
Primary metric
Win with 77 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
77 scrimmage yards and 16.7 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Clemson
551 primary output · 64.5 efficiency · 8.7 usage
54.8
#2
2018 Regular Season · Clemson
54.8
551 primary · 64.5 efficiency · 8.7 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Clemson
51.3
374 primary · 50.9 efficiency · 9.6 usage
Milestones
1
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.9015
Thomas County Central · Thomasville, GA
- Committed To
- Clemson
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,429
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.