Usage Score
8.7
Player Dossier
2014-2018Clemson
RB • 5'8" • 210 lbs • Thomasville, GA, USA
Adam Choice leans balanced backfield option traits and 64.5 efficiency.
Usage Score
8.7
Efficiency
64.5
Consistency
45.9
Season Value
54.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Clemson
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Adam Choice, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Clemson. Adam Choice leans balanced backfield option traits and 64.5 efficiency.
Adam Choice played RB for Clemson. Across 5 tracked seasons, Adam Choice recorded 1,250 rushing yards, 179 receiving yards, and 14 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Clemson.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Clemson paired 551 primary output with 64.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 64.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Win with 131 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
15
Scrimmage Yards / G
36.7
Efficiency
64.5
Usage
8.7
Consistency
45.9
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 12. Notre Dame: 30. Unknown: 6. Texas A&M: 27. Georgia Southern: 49. Georgia Tech: 15. Syracuse: 58. Wake Forest: 131. NC State: 8. Florida State: 20. Louisville: 43. Boston College: 19. Duke: 26. South Carolina: 56. Pittsburgh: 51
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 7 by 17.9. Notre Dame: 2 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 31.3. Texas A&M: 3 by 87.5. Georgia Southern: 7 by 72.9. Georgia Tech: 5 by 31.3. Syracuse: 9 by 67.1. Wake Forest: 11 by 99.6. NC State: 3 by 27.8. Florida State: 3 by 69.4. Louisville: 3 by 100. Boston College: 4 by 49.5. Duke: 5 by 54.2. South Carolina: 7 by 83.3. Pittsburgh: 7 by 75.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
15 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Best efficiency game
100 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/8 | @ Alabama | W 44-16 | 7 | 12 | 1.70 | 0 | — | — | 1.7 |
| Sat 12/29 | vs Notre Dame | W 30-3 | 2 | 30 | 15 | 0 | — | — | 15 |
| Sun 12/2 | @ Pittsburgh | W 42-10 | 7 | 51 | 7.30 | 1 | — | — | 7.3 |
| Sun 11/25 | vs South Carolina2+ TD | W 56-35 | 7 | 56 | 8 | 3 | — | — | 8 |
| Sun 11/18 | vs Duke | W 35-6 | 5 | 26 | 5.20 | 0 | — | — | 5.2 |
| Sun 11/11 | @ Boston College | W 27-7 | 4 | 19 | 4.80 | 0 | — | — | 4.8 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Louisville | W 77-16 | 3 | 43 | 14.30 | 0 | — | — | 14.3 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Florida State | W 59-10 | 3 | 20 | 6.70 | 1 | — | — | 6.7 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs NC State | W 41-7 | 3 | 8 | 2.70 | 0 | — | — | 2.7 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Wake Forest100 rush yards | W 63-3 | 10 | 128 | 12.80 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 11.9 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Syracuse | W 27-23 | 9 | 58 | 6.40 | 0 | — | — | 6.4 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Georgia Tech | W 49-21 | 5 | 15 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Georgia Southern | W 38-7 | 7 | 49 | 7 | 1 | — | — | 7 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Texas A&M | W 28-26 | 3 | 27 | 9 | 0 | — | — | 9 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Clemson
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Clemson | 308 | 42.9 | 15.4 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Clemson | 0 | — | — | -308 |
| 2016 Postseason | Clemson | 196 | 37.5 | 7.4 | 196 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Clemson | 196 | 37.5 | 7.4 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Clemson | 374 | 50.9 | 9.6 | 178 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Clemson | 374 | 50.9 | 9.6 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Clemson | 551 | 64.5 | 8.7 | 177 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Clemson | 551 | 64.5 | 8.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Wake Forest
Win with 131 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
131
Primary metric
131 scrimmage yards and 16.9 usage.
#2
Georgia Tech
61
Primary metric
Win with 61 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
61 scrimmage yards and 13.4 usage.
#3
Unknown
89
Primary metric
Game with 89 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
89 scrimmage yards and 17.3 usage.
#4
Louisville
47
Primary metric
Win with 47 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
47 scrimmage yards and 5.6 usage.
#5
NC State
77
Primary metric
Win with 77 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
77 scrimmage yards and 16.7 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Clemson
551 primary output · 64.5 efficiency · 8.7 usage
54.8
#2
2018 Regular Season · Clemson
54.8
551 primary · 64.5 efficiency · 8.7 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Clemson
51.3
374 primary · 50.9 efficiency · 9.6 usage
1
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.9015
Thomas County Central · Thomasville, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,429
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.