Usage Score
11.8
Player Dossier
2013-2018Wisconsin
George Rushing
WR • 6'1" • 200 lbs • Miramar, FL, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
George Rushing reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
50.9
Consistency
62.5
Season Value
56.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Wisconsin
131414151616171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Wisconsin • Buffalo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
George Rushing, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Wisconsin. George Rushing reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Wisconsin paired 136 primary output with 77.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 50.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Wisconsin, Buffalo.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Buffalo
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
18.7
Efficiency
50.9
Usage
11.8
Consistency
62.5
Best Game by takeover score
Troy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 4. Unknown: 10. Temple: 23. Eastern Michigan: 7. Rutgers: 24. Army: 3. Akron: 19. Toledo: 43. Miami (OH): 17. Bowling Green: 37
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 1 by 26.7. Unknown: 2 by 33.3. Temple: 4 by 38.3. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 23.3. Rutgers: 1 by 100. Army: 2 by 10. Akron: 2 by 63.3. Toledo: 5 by 57.3. Miami (OH): 2 by 56.7. Bowling Green: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins24.3 · n=7 · +20.8 vs Losses
Losses3.5 · n=2 · -20.8 vs Wins
First Half13.6 · n=5 · -10.2 vs Second Half
Second Half23.8 · n=5 · +10.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
100 vs Bowling Green
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/23 | @ Troy | L 32-42 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Fri 11/23 | @ Bowling Green | W 44-14 | — | 1 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 1 | 37 |
| Wed 10/31 | vs Miami (OH) | W 51-42 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Toledo | W 31-17 | — | 5 | 43 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Akron | W 24-6 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Army | L 13-42 | — | 2 | 3 | 1.5 | 1.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Rutgers | W 42-13 | — | 1 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 35-28 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Temple | W 36-29 | — | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wisconsin
2013-2017
Opening stop
- 2
Buffalo
2018
Final stop
Season Progression
201320142014201520162016201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Postseason | Wisconsin | 62 | 75 | 10.2 | 62 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 62 | 75 | 10.2 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 10 | 66.7 | 5 | -52 |
| 2016 Postseason | Wisconsin | 136 | 77.6 | 10.7 | 126 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 136 | 77.6 | 10.7 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | -136 |
| 2018 Postseason | Buffalo | 187 | 50.9 | 11.8 | 187 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Buffalo | 187 | 50.9 | 11.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rutgers
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32
Primary metric
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
27
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#3
Bowling Green
37
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Georgia State
26
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#5
Michigan State
24
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Wisconsin
136 primary output · 77.6 efficiency · 10.7 usage
58.5
#2
2016 Regular Season · Wisconsin
58.5
136 primary · 77.6 efficiency · 10.7 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Buffalo
56.2
187 primary · 50.9 efficiency · 11.8 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8752
Blue Valley · Stilwell, KS
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
395
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.