Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
North Texas paired 44.5 primary output with 71.6 efficiency.
Player Stats
E.J. Ejiya College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Tackles
- 272
- TFL
- 41
- Sacks
- 16
- QB hurries
- 16
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | North Texas | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Postseason | North Texas | 13 | 3 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 20.1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | North Texas | 13 | 40 | 3.5 | 0 | 2 | - | 0 | 20.1 |
| 2017 Postseason | North Texas | 13 | 8 | 2 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 65.4 |
| 2017 Regular Season | North Texas | 13 | 100 | 10 | 7 | 4 | - | 0 | 65.4 |
| 2018 Postseason | North Texas | 13 | 8 | 2 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 85.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | North Texas | 13 | 113 | 23.5 | 9 | 10 | - | 0 | 85.5 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 71.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · North Texas
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
3.4
Efficiency
71.6
Usage
20.4
Consistency
70.6
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 2. SMU: 5. Incarnate Word: 3. Arkansas: 5. Liberty: 3. Louisiana Tech: 3. UTEP: 2.5. Southern Miss: 5. UAB: 3. Rice: 2.5. Old Dominion: 2. Florida Atlantic: 2.5. UTSA: 6
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 8 by 53.3. SMU: 5 by 70.8. Incarnate Word: 8 by 63.3. Arkansas: 12 by 100. Liberty: 8 by 63.3. Louisiana Tech: 9 by 67.5. UTEP: 9 by 62.5. Southern Miss: 12 by 100. UAB: 14 by 80. Rice: 8 by 58.3. Old Dominion: 9 by 57.5. Florida Atlantic: 8 by 58.3. UTSA: 11 by 95.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins3.8 · Games = 9 · +1.3 vs Losses
Losses2.5 · Games = 4 · -1.3 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring E.J. Ejiya
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.