Player Dossier

2015-2018

North Texas

E.J. Ejiya

LB • 6'3" • 230 lbs • Blain, MN, USA

Backfield disruptorDown-to-down presence

E.J. Ejiya shows a backfield disruptor profile with 71.6 disruption score.

Usage Score

20.4

Efficiency

71.6

Consistency

70.6

Season Value

65.7

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by Season Value: 2018 Postseason · North Texas

15161617171818

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
North Texas
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

E.J. Ejiya, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2018 Postseason · North Texas. E.J. Ejiya shows a backfield disruptor profile with 71.6 disruption score.

E.J. Ejiya played LB for North Texas. Across 4 tracked seasons, E.J. Ejiya recorded 272 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with North Texas.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

North Texas paired 44.5 primary output with 71.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 71.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTSA

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · North Texas

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

3.4

Efficiency

71.6

Usage

20.4

Consistency

70.6

Best Game by takeover score

UTSA

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 2. SMU: 5. Incarnate Word: 3. Arkansas: 5. Liberty: 3. Louisiana Tech: 3. UTEP: 2.5. Southern Miss: 5. UAB: 3. Rice: 2.5. Old Dominion: 2. Florida Atlantic: 2.5. UTSA: 6

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 8 by 53.3. SMU: 5 by 70.8. Incarnate Word: 8 by 63.3. Arkansas: 12 by 100. Liberty: 8 by 63.3. Louisiana Tech: 9 by 67.5. UTEP: 9 by 62.5. Southern Miss: 12 by 100. UAB: 14 by 80. Rice: 8 by 58.3. Old Dominion: 9 by 57.5. Florida Atlantic: 8 by 58.3. UTSA: 11 by 95.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins3.8 · Games = 9 · +1.3 vs Losses
Losses2.5 · Games = 4 · -1.3 vs Wins

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Havoc Plays

Top game by takeover score

UTSA

Best efficiency game

100 vs Southern Miss

Result
Sat 12/15vs Utah StateSplash gameL 13-5285200
Sun 11/25@ UTSA10+ tackles · 2+ sacksW 24-21117420
Fri 11/16vs Florida AtlanticSplash gameW 41-38861.5000
Sat 11/10@ Old DominionSplash gameL 31-3493200
Sat 10/27vs RiceSplash gameW 41-17850.5000
Sat 10/20@ UAB10+ tackles · Splash gameL 21-2914101.500.500
Sat 10/13vs Southern Miss10+ tackles · 2+ sacksW 30-7126320
Sat 10/6@ UTEPSplash gameW 27-249210.500
Sat 9/29vs Louisiana TechSplash gameL 27-2994100
Sat 9/22@ LibertySplash gameW 47-782110
Sat 9/15@ Arkansas10+ tackles · Splash gameW 44-17127310
Sat 9/8vs Incarnate WordSplash gameW 58-1682300
Sat 9/1vs SMU2+ sacks · Splash gameW 46-2352220

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    North Texas

    2015-2018

    Opening stop

Season Value Progression

2015201620162017201720182018
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2015 Regular SeasonNorth Texas0
2016 PostseasonNorth Texas5.5184.45.5
2016 Regular SeasonNorth Texas5.5184.40
2017 PostseasonNorth Texas2352.315.217.5
2017 Regular SeasonNorth Texas2352.315.20
2018 PostseasonNorth Texas44.571.620.421.5
2018 Regular SeasonNorth Texas44.571.620.40

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

UTSA

Win with backfield disruption leading the way.

6

Primary metric

6 disruption/tackle impact with 76.3 takeover score.

#2

Arkansas

5

Primary metric

Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

5 disruption/tackle impact with 68.6 takeover score.

#3

Southern Miss

5

Primary metric

Win with backfield disruption leading the way.

5 disruption/tackle impact with 68.1 takeover score.

#4

Iowa

4.5

Primary metric

Loss with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 66.9 takeover score.

#5

SMU

5

Primary metric

Win with backfield disruption leading the way.

5 disruption/tackle impact with 61.7 takeover score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by Season Value

2018 Postseason · North Texas

44.5 primary output · 71.6 efficiency · 20.4 usage

65.7

#2

2018 Regular Season · North Texas

65.7

44.5 primary · 71.6 efficiency · 20.4 usage

#3

2017 Postseason · North Texas

44.2

23 primary · 52.3 efficiency · 15.2 usage

Milestones

5

Impact games

21

Splash games

8

10+ tackle games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit context is not available for this player in the current dataset.

Career Facts

1

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

272

Career Tackles

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.