Usage Score
5.1
Player Dossier
2014-2018USC
CB • 5'10" • 190 lbs • Los Angeles, CA, USA
Ajene Harris shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 27.8 disruption score.
Usage Score
5.1
Efficiency
27.8
Consistency
13.3
Season Value
35.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2014 Regular Season · USC
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ajene Harris, CB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2014 Regular Season · USC. Ajene Harris shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 27.8 disruption score.
Ajene Harris played CB for USC. Across 5 tracked seasons, Ajene Harris recorded 14 rushing yards, 38 receiving yards, and 128 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with USC.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
USC paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 27.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Colorado
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
27.8
Usage
5.1
Consistency
13.3
Best Game by takeover score
Colorado
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UNLV: 0. Stanford: 0. Texas: 2. Washington State: 0. Arizona: 2. Colorado: 4. Utah: 0. Arizona State: 0. UCLA: 0. Notre Dame: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UNLV: 3 by 12.5. Stanford: 3 by 12.5. Texas: 4 by 36.7. Washington State: 6 by 25. Arizona: 2 by 28.3. Colorado: 7 by 69.2. Utah: 1 by 4.2. Arizona State: 7 by 29.2. UCLA: 8 by 33.3. Notre Dame: 4 by 26.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Colorado
Best efficiency game
69.2 vs Colorado
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/25 | vs Notre Dame | L 17-24 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | @ UCLA | L 27-34 | 8 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Arizona State | L 35-38 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/21 | @ Utah | L 28-41 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/14 | vs ColoradoSplash game | W 31-20 | 7 | 5 | — | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/30 | @ ArizonaSplash game | W 24-20 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Washington State | W 39-36 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/16 | @ TexasSplash game | L 14-37 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 9/9 | @ Stanford | L 3-17 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs UNLV | W 43-21 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
USC
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | USC | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | USC | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | USC | 9.5 | 16.6 | 3.9 | 9.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | USC | 9.5 | 16.6 | 3.9 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | USC | 9 | 23.2 | 4.6 | -0.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | USC | 9 | 23.2 | 4.6 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | USC | 9 | 27.8 | 5.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Colorado
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 60.3 takeover score.
#2
Colorado
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 57.9 takeover score.
#3
Notre Dame
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.9 takeover score.
#4
California
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 33.7 takeover score.
#5
Arizona
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 30.1 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2014 Regular Season · USC
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2016 Postseason · USC
39.7
9.5 primary · 16.6 efficiency · 3.9 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · USC
39.7
9.5 primary · 16.6 efficiency · 3.9 usage
1
Impact games
6
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
128
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.