Usage Score
23.5
Player Dossier
2014-2016USC
WR • 6'2" • Long Beach, CA, USA
JuJu Smith-Schuster reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
23.5
Efficiency
74.4
Consistency
61.7
Season Value
55.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · USC
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
JuJu Smith-Schuster, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · USC. JuJu Smith-Schuster reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
JuJu Smith-Schuster played WR for USC. Across 3 tracked seasons, JuJu Smith-Schuster recorded 34 rushing yards, 3,092 receiving yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2015 with USC.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
USC paired 1,454 primary output with 92 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 74.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
70.3
Efficiency
74.4
Usage
23.5
Consistency
61.7
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 133. Alabama: 9. Utah State: 56. Stanford: 34. Utah: 98. Arizona State: 123. Colorado: 113. Arizona: 132. California: 66. Oregon: 10. Washington: 41. UCLA: 76. Notre Dame: 23
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 7 by 100. Alabama: 1 by 60. Utah State: 7 by 53.3. Stanford: 3 by 75.6. Utah: 8 by 81.7. Arizona State: 7 by 100. Colorado: 5 by 100. Arizona: 9 by 97.8. California: 6 by 73.3. Oregon: 2 by 33.3. Washington: 3 by 91.1. UCLA: 8 by 63.3. Notre Dame: 4 by 38.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona
Best efficiency game
100 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | @ Penn State100 receiving yards | W 52-49 | — | 7 | 133 | 16.9 | 19 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Notre Dame | W 45-27 | — | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 1 | 9 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ UCLAHigh volume | W 36-14 | — | 8 | 76 | 8.9 | 9.50 | 0 | 28 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Washington | W 26-13 | — | 3 | 41 | 9.3 | 13.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Oregon | W 45-20 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 9 |
| Fri 10/28 | vs California | W 45-24 | — | 6 | 66 | 11.4 | 11 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Arizona100 receiving yards · High volume | W 48-14 | — | 9 | 132 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 3 | 46 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Colorado100 receiving yards | W 21-17 | — | 5 | 113 | 22.6 | 22.60 | 0 | 34 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Arizona State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 41-20 | — | 7 | 123 | 17.6 | 17.60 | 3 | 67 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ UtahHigh volume | L 27-31 | — | 8 | 98 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 35 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ Stanford | L 10-27 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Utah State2+ TD | W 45-7 | — | 7 | 56 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 15 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Alabama | L 6-52 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
USC
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | USC | 724 | 66.9 | 17 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | USC | 724 | 66.9 | 17 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | USC | 1,454 | 92 | 29.4 | 730 |
| 2015 Regular Season | USC | 1,454 | 92 | 29.4 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | USC | 914 | 74.4 | 23.5 | -540 |
| 2016 Regular Season | USC | 914 | 74.4 | 23.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Arizona
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
132
Primary metric
132 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#2
Idaho
192
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
192 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona State
123
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Penn State
133
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Fresno State
123
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Postseason · USC
1,454 primary output · 92 efficiency · 29.4 usage
72.8
#2
2015 Regular Season · USC
72.8
1,454 primary · 92 efficiency · 29.4 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · USC
55.6
914 primary · 74.4 efficiency · 23.5 usage
12
100+ receiving yards
8
8+ catch outings
6
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.9904
Long Beach Poly · Long Beach, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
3,092
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.