Usage Score
7.7
Player Dossier
2017-2019UAB
DL • 6'2" • 290 lbs • Mission Viejo, CA, USA
Garrett Marino shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.9 disruption score.
Usage Score
7.7
Efficiency
32.9
Consistency
31.8
Season Value
43.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · UAB
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Garrett Marino, DL. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · UAB. Garrett Marino shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.9 disruption score.
Garrett Marino played DL for UAB. Across 3 tracked seasons, Garrett Marino recorded 5 rushing yards, -9 receiving yards, and 90 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with UAB.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
UAB paired 29.5 primary output with 32.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 32.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Akron
Win with 6 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
2.1
Efficiency
32.9
Usage
7.7
Consistency
31.8
Best Game by takeover score
Akron
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. App State: 3. Alabama State: 1. Akron: 6. South Alabama: 5. Western Kentucky: 0. Rice: 1. UTSA: 0. Old Dominion: 4. Tennessee: 1. Southern Miss: 4. UTEP: 0. Louisiana Tech: 1. North Texas: 3.5. Florida Atlantic: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. App State: 2 by 38.3. Alabama State: 9 by 47.5. Akron: 4 by 66.7. South Alabama: 3 by 62.5. Western Kentucky: 1 by 4.2. Rice: 0 by 10. UTSA: 2 by 8.3. Old Dominion: 3 by 52.5. Tennessee: 1 by 14.2. Southern Miss: 5 by 60.8. UTEP: 2 by 8.3. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 30.8. North Texas: 4 by 51.7. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 4.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Akron
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs Akron
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/22 | vs App StateSplash game | L 17-31 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 12/7 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 6-49 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | @ North TexasSplash game | W 26-21 | 4 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 20-14 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs UTEP | W 37-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Southern MissSplash game | L 2-37 | 5 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Tennessee | L 7-30 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Old DominionSplash game | W 38-14 | 3 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ UTSA | W 33-14 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Rice | W 35-20 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Western Kentucky | L 13-20 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs South Alabama2+ sacks · Splash game | W 35-3 | 3 | 3 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ AkronSplash game | W 31-20 | 4 | 0 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Alabama State | W 24-19 | 9 | 9 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UAB
2017-2019
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | UAB | 13.5 | 19.7 | 6.4 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | UAB | 13.5 | 19.7 | 6.4 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UAB | 15 | 18.3 | 6.1 | 1.5 |
| 2019 Postseason | UAB | 29.5 | 32.9 | 7.7 | 14.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UAB | 29.5 | 32.9 | 7.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 63.6 takeover score.
#2
Akron
6
Primary metric
Win with 6 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
6 disruption/tackle impact with 60.6 takeover score.
#3
South Alabama
5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 54.2 takeover score.
#4
Southern Miss
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 53.8 takeover score.
#5
UTSA
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 53.7 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2019 Postseason · UAB
29.5 primary output · 32.9 efficiency · 7.7 usage
43.1
#2
2019 Regular Season · UAB
43.1
29.5 primary · 32.9 efficiency · 7.7 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · UAB
30.5
13.5 primary · 19.7 efficiency · 6.4 usage
2
Impact games
13
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
90
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.