Usage Score
13.2
Player Dossier
2014-2017Stanford
DT • 6'4" • 295 lbs • Omaha, NE, USA
Harrison Phillips shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 46.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
13.2
Efficiency
46.3
Consistency
49.6
Season Value
52.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Stanford
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Harrison Phillips, DT. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Stanford. Harrison Phillips shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 46.3 disruption score.
Harrison Phillips played DT for Stanford. Across 4 tracked seasons, Harrison Phillips recorded 139 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Stanford.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Stanford paired 27 primary output with 46.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 46.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Win with 5.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.9
Efficiency
46.3
Usage
13.2
Consistency
49.6
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. TCU: 0. Rice: 0. USC: 0. San Diego State: 1. UCLA: 2. Arizona State: 5.5. Utah: 2. Oregon: 2. Oregon State: 2. Washington State: 4.5. Washington: 1.5. California: 0.5. Notre Dame: 5. USC: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. TCU: 3 by 12.5. Rice: 5 by 20.8. USC: 11 by 45.8. San Diego State: 11 by 55.8. UCLA: 3 by 32.5. Arizona State: 9 by 87.5. Utah: 6 by 45. Oregon: 3 by 32.5. Oregon State: 9 by 57.5. Washington State: 7 by 74.2. Washington: 2 by 23.3. California: 5 by 25.8. Notre Dame: 6 by 75. USC: 13 by 60
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Arizona State
Best efficiency game
87.5 vs Arizona State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | @ TCU | L 37-39 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/2 | @ USC10+ tackles | L 28-31 | 13 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/26 | vs Notre Dame2+ sacks · Splash game | W 38-20 | 6 | 5 | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/19 | vs California | W 17-14 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Washington | W 30-22 | 2 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Washington StateSplash game | L 21-24 | 7 | 4 | — | 2.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/27 | @ Oregon StateSplash game | W 15-14 | 9 | 5 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/15 | vs OregonSplash game | W 49-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/8 | @ UtahSplash game | W 23-20 | 6 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Arizona StateSplash game | W 34-24 | 9 | 0 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/24 | vs UCLASplash game | W 58-34 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/17 | @ San Diego State10+ tackles | L 17-20 | 11 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | @ USC10+ tackles | L 24-42 | 11 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 8/27 | @ Rice | W 62-7 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Stanford
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Stanford | 20 | 32.6 | 9.3 | 20 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Stanford | 20 | 32.6 | 9.3 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Stanford | 27 | 46.3 | 13.2 | 7 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Stanford | 27 | 46.3 | 13.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Arizona State
Win with 5.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5.5
Primary metric
5.5 disruption/tackle impact with 68.4 takeover score.
#2
North Carolina
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 63.4 takeover score.
#3
Notre Dame
5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 60.8 takeover score.
#4
Washington State
4.5
Primary metric
Loss with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 59 takeover score.
#5
UCLA
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 45.2 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Postseason · Stanford
27 primary output · 46.3 efficiency · 13.2 usage
52.3
#2
2017 Regular Season · Stanford
52.3
27 primary · 46.3 efficiency · 13.2 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Stanford
45.3
20 primary · 32.6 efficiency · 9.3 usage
3
Impact games
14
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
139
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.