Usage Score
3.2
Player Dossier
2017-2018UAB
CB • 6'1" • 195 lbs • Jacksonville, FL, USA
Duke Culver shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 13.7 disruption score.
Usage Score
3.2
Efficiency
13.7
Consistency
12.1
Season Value
32.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · UAB
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Duke Culver, CB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · UAB. Duke Culver shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 13.7 disruption score.
Duke Culver played CB for UAB. Across 2 tracked seasons, Duke Culver recorded 15 passing yards, 4 rushing yards, and 51 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with UAB.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
UAB paired 5 primary output with 13.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 13.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
13.7
Usage
3.2
Consistency
12.1
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Coastal Carolina: 0.5. Tulane: 0. Charlotte: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. Rice: 0. North Texas: 0. UTEP: 0. UTSA: 2.5. Southern Miss: 1. Middle Tennessee: 0. Middle Tennessee: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Coastal Carolina: 1 by 9.2. Tulane: 1 by 4.2. Charlotte: 3 by 12.5. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 12.5. Rice: 2 by 8.3. North Texas: 4 by 16.7. UTEP: 1 by 4.2. UTSA: 3 by 37.5. Southern Miss: 1 by 14.2. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 16.7. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 14.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
37.5 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/1 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 27-25 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 3-27 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/11 | vs Southern Miss | W 26-23 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs UTSASplash game | W 52-3 | 3 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ UTEP | W 19-0 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs North Texas | W 29-21 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Rice | W 42-0 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 28-7 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Charlotte | W 28-7 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Tulane | W 31-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Coastal Carolina | L 24-47 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UAB
2017-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | UAB | 3 | 14.3 | 2.3 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | UAB | 3 | 14.3 | 2.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UAB | 5 | 13.7 | 3.2 | 2 |
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5
Primary metric
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 50.2 takeover score.
#2
Ohio
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 41.7 takeover score.
#3
Alabama A&M
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 24.2 takeover score.
#4
Southern Miss
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 18.4 takeover score.
#5
Middle Tennessee
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 18.3 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2018 Regular Season · UAB
5 primary output · 13.7 efficiency · 3.2 usage
32.2
#2
2017 Postseason · UAB
20.8
3 primary · 14.3 efficiency · 2.3 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · UAB
20.8
3 primary · 14.3 efficiency · 2.3 usage
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
51
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.