Usage Score
9.7
Player Dossier
2014-2017Purdue
Gelen Robinson
DE • 6'1" • 280 lbs • Schererville, IN, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Gelen Robinson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
30.2
Consistency
30.9
Season Value
42.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Purdue
1415161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Gelen Robinson, DE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Purdue. Gelen Robinson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.2 disruption score.
Gelen Robinson played DE for Purdue. Across 4 tracked seasons, Gelen Robinson recorded 112 tackles and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Purdue.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Purdue paired 21 primary output with 30.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 30.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Purdue
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.6
Efficiency
30.2
Usage
9.7
Consistency
30.9
Best Game by takeover score
Nebraska
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 1. Louisville: 0. Ohio: 1. Missouri: 1. Michigan: 3. Minnesota: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Rutgers: 1. Nebraska: 8. Illinois: 1. Northwestern: 1. Iowa: 2. Indiana: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 3 by 22.5. Louisville: 6 by 25. Ohio: 1 by 14.2. Missouri: 1 by 14.2. Michigan: 6 by 55. Minnesota: 4 by 16.7. Wisconsin: 3 by 12.5. Rutgers: 3 by 22.5. Nebraska: 9 by 87.5. Illinois: 0 by 10. Northwestern: 4 by 26.7. Iowa: 4 by 36.7. Indiana: 7 by 49.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.1 · Games = 7 · -1.0 vs Losses
Losses2.2 · Games = 6 · +1.0 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Nebraska
Best efficiency game
87.5 vs Nebraska
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/28 | vs Arizona | W 38-35 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | vs IndianaSplash game | W 31-24 | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ IowaSplash game | W 24-15 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | @ Northwestern | L 13-23 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Illinois | W 29-10 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Nebraska2+ sacks · Splash game | L 24-25 | 9 | 7 | — | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Rutgers | L 12-14 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Wisconsin | L 9-17 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Minnesota | W 31-17 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs MichiganSplash game | L 10-28 | 6 | 5 | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Missouri | W 35-3 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Ohio | W 44-21 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Louisville | L 28-35 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20142015201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Purdue | 14.5 | 33.3 | 12.1 | 14.5 |
| 2017 Postseason | Purdue | 21 | 30.2 | 9.7 | 6.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Purdue | 21 | 30.2 | 9.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Nebraska
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
8
Primary metric
8 disruption/tackle impact with 76.8 takeover score.
#2
Indiana
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 60.5 takeover score.
#3
Minnesota
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 58.8 takeover score.
#4
Wisconsin
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 50.1 takeover score.
#5
Maryland
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 42.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Postseason · Purdue
21 primary output · 30.2 efficiency · 9.7 usage
42.7
#2
2017 Regular Season · Purdue
42.7
21 primary · 30.2 efficiency · 9.7 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Purdue
40.6
14.5 primary · 33.3 efficiency · 12.1 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
9
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
112
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Gelen Robinson
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.