Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2006-2009Mississippi State
—
Boobie Dixon shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
57.6
Season Value
66.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2007 Regular Season · Mississippi State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Boobie Dixon, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2007 Regular Season · Mississippi State. Boobie Dixon shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Boobie Dixon is listed for Mississippi State. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season
Mississippi State paired 16 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
1.1
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
57.6
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 1. Vanderbilt: 0. LSU: 2. Georgia Tech: 0. Houston: 2. Middle Tennessee: 2. Florida: 0. Kentucky: 2. Alabama: 0. Arkansas: 2. Ole Miss: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
— vs Ole Miss
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | vs Ole Miss | W 41-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 29 | 133 | 4.60 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Arkansas | L 21-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24 | 176 | 7.30 | 2 | 70 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs Alabama | L 3-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22 | 81 | 3.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Kentucky | W 31-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33 | 252 | 7.60 | 2 | 47 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Florida | L 19-29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15 | 53 | 3.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 27-6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 27 | 135 | 5 | 2 | 57 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Houston | L 24-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21 | 134 | 6.40 | 2 | 50 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Georgia Tech | L 31-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18 | 106 | 5.90 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs LSU | L 26-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 27 | 106 | 3.90 | 2 | 18 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Vanderbilt | W 15-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21 | 123 | 5.90 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Auburn | L 24-49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20 | 92 | 4.60 | 1 | 27 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Mississippi State
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 6 | — | — | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 16 | — | — | 10 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 9 | — | — | -7 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 12 | — | — | 3 |
#1 Featured game
Ole Miss
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Arkansas
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
Kentucky
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
West Virginia
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
UAB
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by Season Value
2007 Regular Season · Mississippi State
16 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
81
#2
2009 Regular Season · Mississippi State
66.3
12 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2006 Regular Season · Mississippi State
46
6 primary · — efficiency · — usage
19
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.