Usage Score
32.6
Player Dossier
2007-2009Central Michigan
WR • 5'10" • Miami, FL, USA
Antonio Brown reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
32.6
Efficiency
67.2
Consistency
58.9
Season Value
64.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Central Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Antonio Brown, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Central Michigan. Antonio Brown reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Antonio Brown played WR for Central Michigan. Across 3 tracked seasons, Antonio Brown recorded 26 passing yards, 518 rushing yards, and 3,176 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Central Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Central Michigan paired 1,198 primary output with 67.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 67.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
85.6
Efficiency
67.2
Usage
32.6
Consistency
58.9
Best Game by takeover score
Ball State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 178. Arizona: 23. Michigan State: 71. Alcorn State: 32. Akron: 89. Buffalo: 112. Eastern Michigan: 110. Western Michigan: 39. Bowling Green: 68. Boston College: 61. Toledo: 129. Ball State: 170. Northern Illinois: 50. Ohio: 66
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 13 by 91.3. Arizona: 5 by 30.7. Michigan State: 10 by 47.3. Alcorn State: 4 by 53.3. Akron: 9 by 65.9. Buffalo: 6 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 100. Western Michigan: 5 by 52. Bowling Green: 5 by 90.7. Boston College: 8 by 50.8. Toledo: 13 by 66.2. Ball State: 11 by 100. Northern Illinois: 9 by 37. Ohio: 8 by 55
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ball State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ball State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/7 | @ Troy100 receiving yards · High volume | W 44-41 | — | 13 | 178 | 11.8 | 13.70 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 12/5 | vs OhioHigh volume | W 20-10 | — | 8 | 66 | 6.6 | 8.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Fri 11/27 | vs Northern IllinoisHigh volume | W 45-31 | — | 9 | 50 | 5.3 | 5.60 | 0 | 29 |
| Thu 11/19 | @ Ball State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 35-3 | — | 11 | 170 | 13.7 | 15.50 | 1 | 82 |
| Thu 11/12 | vs Toledo100 receiving yards · High volume | W 56-28 | — | 13 | 129 | 9.5 | 9.90 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Boston CollegeHigh volume | L 10-31 | — | 8 | 61 | 7.1 | 7.60 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Bowling Green | W 24-10 | — | 5 | 68 | 10 | 13.60 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Western Michigan | W 34-23 | — | 5 | 39 | 11.8 | 7.80 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Eastern Michigan100 receiving yards | W 56-8 | — | 4 | 110 | 19.3 | 27.50 | 1 | 70 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Buffalo100 receiving yards | W 20-13 | — | 6 | 112 | 16.3 | 18.70 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs AkronHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 48-21 | — | 9 | 89 | 11 | 9.90 | 2 | 30 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Alcorn State | W 48-0 | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Michigan StateHigh volume | W 29-27 | — | 10 | 71 | 6.2 | 7.10 | 1 | 16 |
| Sun 9/6 | @ Arizona | L 6-19 | — | 5 | 23 | 6.8 | 4.60 | 0 | 7 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Central Michigan
2007-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | Central Michigan | 980 | 63.8 | 28.8 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 980 | 63.8 | 28.8 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Central Michigan | 998 | 67.1 | 29.5 | 18 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 998 | 67.1 | 29.5 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Central Michigan | 1,198 | 67.2 | 32.6 | 200 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 1,198 | 67.2 | 32.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Ball State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
170
Primary metric
170 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Eastern Michigan
172
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
172 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Troy
178
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
178 receiving yards with a 91.3 efficiency score.
#4
Akron
174
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
174 receiving yards with a 77.3 efficiency score.
#5
Indiana
138
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
138 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Postseason · Central Michigan
1,198 primary output · 67.2 efficiency · 32.6 usage
64.7
#2
2009 Regular Season · Central Michigan
64.7
1,198 primary · 67.2 efficiency · 32.6 usage
#3
2007 Postseason · Central Michigan
60.7
980 primary · 63.8 efficiency · 28.8 usage
10
100+ receiving yards
20
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
3,176
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.