Usage Score
27
Player Dossier
2008-2011Penn State
Derek Moye
WR • 6'5" • Rochester, PA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Derek Moye reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
90.2
Consistency
56.5
Season Value
61.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · Penn State
08090910101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Penn State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Derek Moye, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · Penn State. Derek Moye reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Derek Moye played WR for Penn State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Derek Moye recorded 44 rushing yards, 2,395 receiving yards, and 18 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Penn State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Penn State paired 885 primary output with 87.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 90.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Penn State
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
59.5
Efficiency
90.2
Usage
27
Consistency
56.5
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 0. Indiana State: 57. Alabama: 51. Temple: 112. Eastern Michigan: 65. Indiana: 158. Iowa: 42. Illinois: 29. Nebraska: 78. Ohio State: 40. Wisconsin: 22
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana State: 4 by 95. Alabama: 3 by 100. Temple: 7 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 6 by 72.2. Indiana: 6 by 100. Iowa: 2 by 100. Illinois: 2 by 96.7. Nebraska: 4 by 100. Ohio State: 3 by 88.9. Wisconsin: 3 by 48.9
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins71.9 · Games = 7 · +34.1 vs Losses
Losses37.8 · Games = 4 · -34.1 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
100 vs Nebraska
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | vs Houston | L 14-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Wisconsin | L 7-45 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Ohio State | W 20-14 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Nebraska | L 14-17 | — | 4 | 78 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Illinois | W 10-7 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Iowa | W 13-3 | — | 2 | 42 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Indiana100 receiving yards | W 16-10 | — | 6 | 158 | 26.3 | 26.30 | 1 | 74 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Eastern Michigan2+ TD | W 34-6 | — | 6 | 65 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 2 | 20 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Temple100 receiving yards | W 14-10 | — | 7 | 112 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Alabama | L 11-27 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Indiana State | W 41-7 | — | 4 | 57 | 10.8 | 14.30 | 0 | 29 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Penn State
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
2008200920092010201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Penn State | 71 | 91.1 | 4.9 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Penn State | 785 | 89.2 | 20.9 | 714 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Penn State | 785 | 89.2 | 20.9 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Penn State | 885 | 87.2 | 22.7 | 100 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Penn State | 885 | 87.2 | 22.7 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Penn State | 654 | 90.2 | 27 | -231 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Penn State | 654 | 90.2 | 27 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
158
Primary metric
158 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Illinois
106
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Akron
138
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
138 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Northwestern
123
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Minnesota
120
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Postseason · Penn State
885 primary output · 87.2 efficiency · 22.7 usage
72.6
#2
2010 Regular Season · Penn State
72.6
885 primary · 87.2 efficiency · 22.7 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Penn State
65
785 primary · 89.2 efficiency · 20.9 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,395
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Derek Moye
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.