Usage Score
8.1
Player Dossier
2008-2010UConn
QB • 6'4" • Mechanicsburg, PA, USA
Zach Frazer is a balanced quarterback profile with 8.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
8.1
Efficiency
56.7
Consistency
70.6
Season Value
58.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · UConn
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Zach Frazer, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · UConn. Zach Frazer is a balanced quarterback profile with 8.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Zach Frazer played QB for UConn. Across 3 tracked seasons, Zach Frazer recorded 3,422 passing yards, -16 rushing yards, and 17 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with UConn.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
UConn paired 1,439 primary output with 56.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 56.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas Southern
Win with 104 yards of offense and 87.7 efficiency. It landed in the 45.5th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
130.8
Efficiency
56.7
Usage
8.1
Consistency
70.6
Best Game by takeover score
Texas Southern
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 206. Michigan: 214. Texas Southern: 104. Temple: 152. Buffalo: 82. Louisville: 52. West Virginia: 165. Pittsburgh: 101. Syracuse: 103. Cincinnati: 137. South Florida: 123
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 43 by 44. Michigan: 39 by 60. Texas Southern: 9 by 87.7. Temple: 36 by 49. Buffalo: 16 by 44.3. Louisville: 8 by 76.4. West Virginia: 36 by 52.4. Pittsburgh: 21 by 44.2. Syracuse: 22 by 62.7. Cincinnati: 28 by 52.8. South Florida: 32 by 50
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Texas Southern
Best efficiency game
87.7 vs Texas Southern
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 1/2 | @ Oklahoma | L 20-48 | 19 | 39 | 223 | 48.7 | 0 | 2 | 44 | 4 | -17 | -4.30 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun 12/5 | @ South Florida | W 19-16 | 13 | 29 | 112 | 44.8 | 0 | 1 | 50 | 3 | 11 | 3.70 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Cincinnati | W 38-17 | 11 | 24 | 121 | 45.8 | 1 | 1 | 52.8 | 4 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 11/21 | @ Syracuse | W 23-6 | 13 | 21 | 98 | 61.9 | 0 | 0 | 62.7 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Fri 11/12 | vs Pittsburgh | W 30-28 | 9 | 20 | 100 | 45.0 | 2 | 1 | 44.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs West Virginia | W 16-13 | 18 | 29 | 166 | 62.1 | 0 | 0 | 52.4 | 7 | -1 | -0.10 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Louisville | L 0-26 | 6 | 8 | 52 | 75.0 | 0 | 0 | 76.4 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Buffalo | W 45-21 | 7 | 14 | 94 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | 44.3 | 2 | -12 | -6 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Temple | L 16-30 | 16 | 31 | 150 | 51.6 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 5 | 2 | 0.40 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Texas Southern | W 62-3 | 6 | 9 | 104 | 66.7 | 2 | 0 | 87.7 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Michigan | L 10-30 | 18 | 37 | 205 | 48.6 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 2 | 9 | 4.50 | 0 | 13 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UConn
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | UConn | 534 | 40.2 | 5.9 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | UConn | 1,433 | 51.4 | 6.2 | 899 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UConn | 1,433 | 51.4 | 6.2 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | UConn | 1,439 | 56.7 | 8.1 | 6 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UConn | 1,439 | 56.7 | 8.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Texas Southern
Win with 104 yards of offense and 87.7 efficiency.
104
Primary metric
104 total offense with 87.7 efficiency.
#2
Syracuse
173
Primary metric
Win with 173 yards of offense and 70.5 efficiency.
173 total offense with 70.5 efficiency.
#3
Rutgers
235
Primary metric
Loss with 235 yards of offense and 67.1 efficiency.
235 total offense with 67.1 efficiency.
#4
Michigan
214
Primary metric
Loss with 214 yards of offense and 60 efficiency.
214 total offense with 60 efficiency.
#5
Rutgers
333
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
333 total offense with 45 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Postseason · UConn
1,439 primary output · 56.7 efficiency · 8.1 usage
58.8
#2
2010 Regular Season · UConn
58.8
1,439 primary · 56.7 efficiency · 8.1 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · UConn
55
1,433 primary · 51.4 efficiency · 6.2 usage
2
250+ passing yards
1
300+ total offense
0
3+ TD games
7
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
3,406
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.