Usage Score
21.2
Player Dossier
2008-2011UConn
Kashif Moore
WR • 5'10" • Burlington, NJ, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Kashif Moore reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
91.1
Consistency
47.6
Season Value
63.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · UConn
08080909101011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- UConn
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kashif Moore, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · UConn. Kashif Moore reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
UConn paired 604 primary output with 91.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 91.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2011 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · UConn
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
50.3
Efficiency
91.1
Usage
21.2
Consistency
47.6
Best Game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 25. Vanderbilt: 14. Iowa State: 46. Buffalo: 23. Western Michigan: 112. West Virginia: 36. South Florida: 36. Pittsburgh: 106. Syracuse: 15. Louisville: 110. Rutgers: 34. Cincinnati: 47
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 100. Vanderbilt: 1 by 93.3. Iowa State: 3 by 100. Buffalo: 3 by 51.1. Western Michigan: 8 by 93.3. West Virginia: 3 by 80. South Florida: 2 by 100. Pittsburgh: 6 by 100. Syracuse: 1 by 100. Louisville: 7 by 100. Rutgers: 3 by 75.6. Cincinnati: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins27 · n=4 · -40.3 vs Losses
Losses67.3 · n=7 · +40.3 vs Wins
First Half42.7 · n=6 · -15.3 vs Second Half
Second Half58 · n=6 · +15.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisville
Best efficiency game
100 vs Cincinnati
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/3 | @ Cincinnati | L 27-35 | — | 3 | 47 | 12 | 15.70 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Rutgers | W 40-22 | — | 3 | 34 | 9.5 | 11.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Louisville100 receiving yards | L 20-34 | — | 7 | 110 | 13.4 | 15.70 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Syracuse | W 28-21 | — | 1 | 15 | 6 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Thu 10/27 | @ Pittsburgh100 receiving yards | L 20-35 | — | 6 | 106 | 15.7 | 17.70 | 1 | 62 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs South Florida | W 16-10 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ West Virginia | L 16-43 | — | 3 | 36 | 8.8 | 12 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Western Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | L 31-38 | — | 8 | 112 | 14 | 14 | 2 | 47 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Buffalo | W 17-3 | — | 3 | 23 | 6.3 | 7.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Iowa State | L 20-24 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Vanderbilt | L 21-24 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 25 | 16 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UConn
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
2008200820092009201020102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | UConn | 273 | 65.3 | 19.8 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | UConn | 273 | 65.3 | 19.8 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | UConn | 370 | 84.6 | 14.7 | 97 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UConn | 370 | 84.6 | 14.7 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | UConn | 452 | 72.3 | 19.9 | 82 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UConn | 452 | 72.3 | 19.9 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | UConn | 604 | 91.1 | 21.2 | 152 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisville
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
110
Primary metric
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
112
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
70
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Pittsburgh
106
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Cincinnati
77
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · UConn
604 primary output · 91.1 efficiency · 21.2 usage
63.7
#2
2010 Postseason · UConn
56.6
452 primary · 72.3 efficiency · 19.9 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · UConn
56.6
452 primary · 72.3 efficiency · 19.9 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.7
Apex · Apex, NC
- Committed To
- UConn
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,699
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.