Usage Score
13.8
Player Dossier
2007-2009Tulsa
WR • 5'9" • Nashville, AR, USA
A.J. Whitmore reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
13.8
Efficiency
54.5
Consistency
44.2
Season Value
50.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Regular Season · Tulsa
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
A.J. Whitmore, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Regular Season · Tulsa. A.J. Whitmore reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
A.J. Whitmore played WR for Tulsa. Across 3 tracked seasons, A.J. Whitmore recorded 131 passing yards, 681 rushing yards, and 520 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2008 with Tulsa.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 238 primary output with 54.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 54.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
23.8
Efficiency
54.5
Usage
13.8
Consistency
44.2
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulane: 20. New Mexico: 52. Oklahoma: 14. Sam Houston: 5. Rice: 72. Boise State: 5. UTEP: 12. SMU: 29. Southern Miss: 5. Memphis: 24
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulane: 3 by 44.4. New Mexico: 6 by 57.8. Oklahoma: 2 by 46.7. Sam Houston: 1 by 33.3. Rice: 5 by 96. Boise State: 2 by 16.7. UTEP: 1 by 80. SMU: 1 by 100. Southern Miss: 2 by 16.7. Memphis: 3 by 53.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
100 vs SMU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/27 | vs Memphis | W 33-30 | — | 3 | 24 | 6.2 | 8 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 11/22 | @ Southern Miss | L 34-44 | — | 2 | 5 | 2.3 | 2.50 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs SMU | L 13-27 | — | 1 | 29 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 29 |
| Thu 10/22 | @ UTEP | L 24-28 | — | 1 | 12 | 8.8 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Thu 10/15 | vs Boise State | L 21-28 | — | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 2.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Rice | W 27-10 | — | 5 | 72 | 10.3 | 14.40 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Sam Houston | W 56-3 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Oklahoma | L 0-45 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 9/13 | @ New Mexico | W 44-10 | — | 6 | 52 | 8.3 | 8.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Tulane | W 37-13 | — | 3 | 20 | 2.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulsa
2007-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | Tulsa | 21 | 38.3 | 4.1 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Tulsa | 21 | 38.3 | 4.1 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Tulsa | 261 | 49.8 | 11 | 240 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Tulsa | 261 | 49.8 | 11 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulsa | 238 | 54.5 | 13.8 | -23 |
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
72
Primary metric
72 receiving yards with a 96 efficiency score.
#2
Marshall
70
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UL Monroe
15
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UAB
63
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 84 efficiency score.
#5
New Mexico
52
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 57.8 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Regular Season · Tulsa
238 primary output · 54.5 efficiency · 13.8 usage
50.9
#2
2008 Postseason · Tulsa
47.7
261 primary · 49.8 efficiency · 11 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Tulsa
47.7
261 primary · 49.8 efficiency · 11 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
520
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.