Usage Score
16.8
Player Profile
Riley Dunlop
WR • 6'2" • Liberty Township, OH, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Riley Dunlop reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.3
Consistency
54.8
Season Value
62.5
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Ohio
080910101111
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- Ohio
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Ohio
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Troy
Riley Dunlop, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Ohio. Riley Dunlop reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Ohio paired 586 primary output with 78.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Ohio
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
45.1
Efficiency
78.3
Usage
16.8
Consistency
54.8
Best Game by takeover score
Utah State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 35. New Mexico State: 7. Unknown: 32. Rutgers: 80. Kent State: 53. Buffalo: 66. Ball State: 59. Akron: 70. Temple: 9. Central Michigan: 18. Bowling Green: 96. Miami (OH): 30. Northern Illinois: 31
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 3 by 77.8. New Mexico State: 1 by 46.7. Unknown: 2 by 100. Rutgers: 4 by 100. Kent State: 5 by 70.7. Buffalo: 6 by 73.3. Ball State: 4 by 98.3. Akron: 3 by 100. Temple: 1 by 60. Central Michigan: 3 by 40. Bowling Green: 5 by 100. Miami (OH): 2 by 100. Northern Illinois: 4 by 51.7
Split Comparison
Wins39.8 · n=8 · -19.3 vs Losses
Losses59 · n=4 · +19.3 vs Wins
First Half47.4 · n=7 · +5.1 vs Second Half
Second Half42.3 · n=6 · -5.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
100 vs Miami (OH)
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | @ Utah State | W 24-23 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 12/3 | @ Northern Illinois | L 20-23 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 9 |
| Wed 11/23 | vs Miami (OH) | W 21-14 | — | 2 | 30 | 12.7 | 15 | 1 | 26 |
| Thu 11/17 | @ Bowling Green | W 29-28 | — | 5 | 96 | 19.2 | 19.20 | 0 | 30 |
| Fri 11/11 | @ Central Michigan | W 43-28 | — | 3 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 11 |
| Thu 11/3 | vs Temple | W 35-31 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Akron | W 37-20 | — | 3 | 70 | 23.3 | 23.30 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Ball State | L 20-23 | — | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Buffalo | L 37-38 | — | 6 | 66 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Kent State | W 17-10 | — | 5 | 53 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Rutgers | L 26-38 | — | 4 | 80 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 18 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ New Mexico State | W 44-24 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
200820092010201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Ohio | 278 | 77.6 | 11 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Ohio | 122 | 60.2 | 14.7 | -156 |
| 2010 Postseason | Ohio | 387 | 76.2 | 19.5 | 265 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Ohio | 387 | 76.2 | 19.5 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Ohio | 586 | 78.3 | 16.8 | 199 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Ohio | 586 | 78.3 | 16.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Troy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
91
Primary metric
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Bowling Green
96
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
70
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Miami (OH)
68
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Rutgers
80
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Ohio
586 primary output · 78.3 efficiency · 16.8 usage
62.5
#2
2011 Regular Season · Ohio
62.5
586 primary · 78.3 efficiency · 16.8 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Ohio
53.3
387 primary · 76.2 efficiency · 19.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.7667
Lakota East · Middletown, OH
- Committed To
- Ohio
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,373
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.