Usage Score
16.8
Player Dossier
2008-2011Ohio
WR • 6'2" • Liberty Township, OH, USA
Riley Dunlop reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
16.8
Efficiency
78.3
Consistency
54.8
Season Value
62.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Ohio
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Riley Dunlop, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Ohio. Riley Dunlop reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Riley Dunlop played WR for Ohio. Across 4 tracked seasons, Riley Dunlop recorded 35 passing yards, 26 rushing yards, and 1,373 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Ohio.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Ohio paired 586 primary output with 78.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
45.1
Efficiency
78.3
Usage
16.8
Consistency
54.8
Best Game by takeover score
Utah State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 35. New Mexico State: 7. Unknown: 32. Rutgers: 80. Kent State: 53. Buffalo: 66. Ball State: 59. Akron: 70. Temple: 9. Central Michigan: 18. Bowling Green: 96. Miami (OH): 30. Northern Illinois: 31
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 3 by 77.8. New Mexico State: 1 by 46.7. Unknown: 2 by 100. Rutgers: 4 by 100. Kent State: 5 by 70.7. Buffalo: 6 by 73.3. Ball State: 4 by 98.3. Akron: 3 by 100. Temple: 1 by 60. Central Michigan: 3 by 40. Bowling Green: 5 by 100. Miami (OH): 2 by 100. Northern Illinois: 4 by 51.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
100 vs Miami (OH)
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | @ Utah State | W 24-23 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 12/3 | @ Northern Illinois | L 20-23 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 9 |
| Wed 11/23 | vs Miami (OH) | W 21-14 | — | 2 | 30 | 12.7 | 15 | 1 | 26 |
| Thu 11/17 | @ Bowling Green | W 29-28 | — | 5 | 96 | 19.2 | 19.20 | 0 | 30 |
| Fri 11/11 | @ Central Michigan | W 43-28 | — | 3 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 11 |
| Thu 11/3 | vs Temple | W 35-31 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Akron | W 37-20 | — | 3 | 70 | 23.3 | 23.30 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Ball State | L 20-23 | — | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Buffalo | L 37-38 | — | 6 | 66 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Kent State | W 17-10 | — | 5 | 53 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Rutgers | L 26-38 | — | 4 | 80 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 18 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ New Mexico State | W 44-24 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Ohio | 278 | 77.6 | 11 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Ohio | 122 | 60.2 | 14.7 | -156 |
| 2010 Postseason | Ohio | 387 | 76.2 | 19.5 | 265 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Ohio | 387 | 76.2 | 19.5 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Ohio | 586 | 78.3 | 16.8 | 199 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Ohio | 586 | 78.3 | 16.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Troy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
91
Primary metric
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Bowling Green
96
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
70
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Miami (OH)
68
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Rutgers
80
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Ohio
586 primary output · 78.3 efficiency · 16.8 usage
62.5
#2
2011 Regular Season · Ohio
62.5
586 primary · 78.3 efficiency · 16.8 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Ohio
53.3
387 primary · 76.2 efficiency · 19.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2007 · Rating 0.7667
Lakota East · Middletown, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,373
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.