Usage Score
23.2
Player Dossier
2008-2011Purdue
Justin Siller
WR • 6'3" • Detroit, MI, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Justin Siller reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
57.8
Consistency
71.7
Season Value
63.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2008 Regular Season · Purdue
0809101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justin Siller, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2008 Regular Season · Purdue. Justin Siller reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Justin Siller played WR for Purdue. Across 4 tracked seasons, Justin Siller recorded 496 passing yards, 264 rushing yards, and 578 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2008 with Purdue.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Purdue paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 57.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Purdue
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
39.5
Efficiency
57.8
Usage
23.2
Consistency
71.7
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 44. Middle Tennessee: 56. Rice: 21. Southeast Missouri State: 61. Notre Dame: 26. Minnesota: 8. Penn State: 67. Illinois: 45. Michigan: 58. Wisconsin: 0. Ohio State: 45. Indiana: 43
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 5 by 58.7. Middle Tennessee: 5 by 74.7. Rice: 4 by 35. Southeast Missouri State: 5 by 81.3. Notre Dame: 4 by 43.3. Minnesota: 2 by 26.7. Penn State: 5 by 89.3. Illinois: 3 by 100. Michigan: 5 by 77.3. Wisconsin: 1 by 0. Ohio State: 6 by 50. Indiana: 5 by 57.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins43.1 · Games = 7 · +8.7 vs Losses
Losses34.4 · Games = 5 · -8.7 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/27 | vs Western Michigan | W 37-32 | — | 5 | 44 | 9.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Indiana | W 33-25 | — | 5 | 43 | 6.4 | 8.60 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Ohio State | W 26-23 | — | 6 | 45 | 7.1 | 7.50 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Wisconsin | L 17-62 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Michigan | L 14-36 | — | 5 | 58 | 8.1 | 11.60 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Illinois | W 21-14 | — | 3 | 45 | 9.7 | 15 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Penn State | L 18-23 | — | 5 | 67 | 13.4 | 13.40 | 0 | 50 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Minnesota | W 45-17 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Notre Dame | L 10-38 | — | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Southeast Missouri State | W 59-0 | — | 5 | 61 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Rice | L 22-24 | — | 4 | 21 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 27-24 | — | 5 | 56 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 31 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20082009201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Purdue | 104 | 59.5 | 14.1 | 104 |
| 2011 Postseason | Purdue | 474 | 57.8 | 23.2 | 370 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Purdue | 474 | 57.8 | 23.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Penn State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
67
Primary metric
67 receiving yards with a 89.3 efficiency score.
#2
Southeast Missouri State
61
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 81.3 efficiency score.
#3
Western Illinois
37
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 82.2 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan
58
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 77.3 efficiency score.
#5
Illinois
45
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2008 Regular Season · Purdue
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2011 Postseason · Purdue
63.2
474 primary · 57.8 efficiency · 23.2 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Purdue
63.2
474 primary · 57.8 efficiency · 23.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
578
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Justin Siller
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.