Usage Score
21
Player Dossier
2009-2011UTEP
Joe Banyard
RB • 5'11" • Sweetwater, TX, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Joe Banyard leans balanced backfield option traits and 55.2 efficiency.
Efficiency
55.2
Consistency
35.7
Season Value
53
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · UTEP
09101011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Joe Banyard, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · UTEP. Joe Banyard leans balanced backfield option traits and 55.2 efficiency.
Joe Banyard played RB for UTEP. Across 3 tracked seasons, Joe Banyard recorded 1,455 rushing yards, 174 receiving yards, and 14 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2011 with UTEP.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
UTEP paired 899 primary output with 55.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 55.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
74.9
Efficiency
55.2
Usage
21
Consistency
35.7
Best Game by takeover score
Houston
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stony Brook: 20. SMU: 33. New Mexico State: 97. South Florida: 16. Houston: 256. Tulane: 97. Colorado State: 34. Southern Miss: 38. Rice: -2. East Carolina: 161. Tulsa: 98. UCF: 51
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stony Brook: 14 by 14.8. SMU: 7 by 47.8. New Mexico State: 8 by 100. South Florida: 6 by 33.6. Houston: 24 by 94.4. Tulane: 9 by 94.9. Colorado State: 6 by 59. Southern Miss: 8 by 49.5. Rice: 2 by 0. East Carolina: 20 by 82.2. Tulsa: 21 by 47.9. UCF: 14 by 37.9
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins81.8 · Games = 5 · +11.8 vs Losses
Losses70 · Games = 7 · -11.8 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
100 vs New Mexico State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ UCF | L 14-31 | 14 | 51 | 3.60 | 1 | — | — | 3.6 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Tulsa | L 28-57 | 20 | 91 | 4.60 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4.7 |
| Sun 11/13 | vs East Carolina100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 22-17 | 18 | 140 | 7.80 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 8.1 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Rice | L 37-41 | 2 | -2 | -1 | 0 | — | — | -1 |
| Sun 10/30 | vs Southern Miss | L 13-31 | 8 | 38 | 4.80 | 0 | — | — | 4.8 |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Colorado State | W 31-17 | 6 | 34 | 5.70 | 0 | — | — | 5.7 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Tulane | W 44-7 | 9 | 97 | 10.80 | 1 | — | — | 10.8 |
| Fri 9/30 | vs Houston100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 42-49 | 22 | 240 | 10.90 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 10.7 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ South Florida | L 24-52 | 5 | 18 | 3.60 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 2.7 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ New Mexico State | W 16-10 | 7 | 90 | 12.90 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 12.1 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ SMU | L 17-28 | 4 | 18 | 4.50 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 4.7 |
| Sun 9/4 | vs Stony Brook | W 31-24 | 12 | 17 | 1.40 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1.4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
2009201020102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Postseason | UTEP | 730 | 57.3 | 19.4 | 730 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UTEP | 730 | 57.3 | 19.4 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | UTEP | 899 | 55.2 | 21 | 169 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Houston
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
256
Primary metric
256 scrimmage yards and 40 usage.
#2
Tulsa
158
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
158 scrimmage yards and 42.9 usage.
#3
East Carolina
161
Primary metric
Win with 161 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
161 scrimmage yards and 31.7 usage.
#4
New Mexico
116
Primary metric
Win with 116 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
116 scrimmage yards and 29.3 usage.
#5
Arkansas-Pine Bluff
114
Primary metric
Win with 114 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
114 scrimmage yards and 36.8 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Regular Season · UTEP
899 primary output · 55.2 efficiency · 21 usage
53
#2
2010 Postseason · UTEP
52.2
730 primary · 57.3 efficiency · 19.4 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · UTEP
52.2
730 primary · 57.3 efficiency · 19.4 usage
Milestones
3
100+ rush yards
3
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,629
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Joe Banyard
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.